Page 249 - Communication and the Evolution of Society

226 Notes

3. J. Stalin, Dialectical and Historical Materialism (New York, 1940).
4. 1. S. Kon, Die Geschichts philoso phie des 20. Jahrhunderts, vol. 2
(Berlin, 1966); E. M. Zukov, “Uber die Periodisierung der Weltge-
schichte,” Sowetwissenschaft (1961, no. 3):241-254; E. Engelberg, “Fra-
gen der Evolution und der Revolution in der Weltgeschichte,” Zeitschrift
far Geschichtswissenschaft, 13 (1965) :9-18; E. Hoffman, “Zwei aktuelle
Probleme der geschichtlichen Entwicklungsfolge fortschreitender Gesell-
schaftsformationen,” Zeitschrift fir Geschichtswissenschaft, 16(1968):
1265-1281; G. Lewin, “Zur Diskussion tiber die marxistische Lehre von
den Gesselischaftsformationen,” Mitteilungen des Instituts fur Orient-
forschung (1969):137-151; and E. Engelberg, ed., Probleme der marx-
istischen Geschichiswissenschaft (Koln, 1972).
5. Marx and Engels, The German Ideology, in L. Easton and K.
Guddat, eds., Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society
(New York, 1967), p. 4009.
6. On the delimitation of action types, cf. J. Habermas, Toward a Ra-
tional Society (Boston, 1970), pp. 91 ff.
7. Marx and Engels, German Ideology, p. 421.
8. Ibid., p. 409.
9. Ibid., p. 402.
10. B. Rensch, Homo Sapiens: From Man to Demi-God (New York,
1972); E. Morin, Das Ratsel des Humanen (Minchen, 1974).
11. C. F. Hockett and R. Ascher, “The Human Revolution,” Current
Anthropology (Feb. 1964) :135-147; G. W. Hewes, “Primate Communi-
cation and the Gestural Origin of Language,’ Current Anthropology
(Feb. 1973) :5—29.
12. On incest barriers among vertebrates, cf. N. Bischoff, “The Bio-
logical Foundations of the Incest-taboo,”’ Social Science Information 6
(1972) :7-36. Ethological investigations do not take into account that it
is the incest barrier between father and daughter that first clears the
culturally innovative way to the family structure. Cf. Meyer Fortes, “Kin-
ship and the Social Order,’ Current Anthropology (April 1972) :285-
206.
13. E. W. Count, Being and Becoming: Essays on the Biogram (New
York, 1973).
14. J. Habermas, “Entwicklung der Interaktionskompetenz,” unpubl.
MS (Starnberg, 1974).
15. Morin, Das Ratsel des Humanen, pp. 115 ff. On the ontogenesis
of time consciousness, cf. J. Piaget, The Child’s Conception of Time
(New York, 1970).
16. D. Claessens, Instinkt, Psyche, Geltung (Opladen, 1967). Durk-
heim has already investigated the obligatory character of action norms,
which to begin with generate their own power of sanction, under the
aspect of the binding of feeling ambivalence; cf. E. Durkheim, Sociology
and Philosophy (New York, 1974): “Furthermore there is another con-