Page 248 - Communication and the Evolution of Society

225 Notes

mation and Response,” Continuum 8 (1970) :123-133, and “On system-
atically distorted Communication,” Inquiry 13 (1970) :205-218.]}
34. In this context I am primarily emphasizing the difference between
rationalization processes attaching to the different aspects of action. Marx
attempted to conceive the zmity of these rationalization processes, draw-
ing on the Hegelian dialectic to characterize the relation of the individual
to society in the precapitalist, capitalist, and postcapitalist periods. C.
Gould makes an interesting attempt at reconstruction in Marx’s Social
Ontology (Cambridge, Mass., 1978).
35. J. H. Flavell, “An Analysis of Cognitive Developmental Sequences,”
Genetic Psychology Monographs 86 (1972) :279-350.
36. M. Godelier, Rationalité et irvationalité en économie (Patis, 1966),
and Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology (Cambridge, 1976). Godelier’s
work is, of course, based on that of Levi-Scrauss.
37. L. Goldmann, Structures Mentales et Création Culturelle (Paris,
1970), Marxisme et Sciences Humaines (Paris, 1970), and La Création
Culturelle dans la Société Moderne (Paris, 1971). —
38. A. Touraine, Production de la Société (Paris, 1972), and Pour la
Sociologie (Paris, 1974).
39. M. Vester, Die Entstehung des Proletariats als Lernprozess (Frank-
furt, 1970); and O. Negt and A. Kluge, Offentlichkeit und Erfahrung
(Frankfurt, 1972).
40. C. Offe, Strukturprobleme des kapitalistischen Staates (Frankfurt,
1972); cf. also M. Janicke, Politische Systemkrisen (K6éln, 1973); and
W. D. Narr and C. Offe, eds, Wohlfahrisstaat und Massenloyalitat
(Koln, 1975).
41. C, Offe, Berufsbildungsreform (Frankfurt, 1975).
42. T. W. Adorno, “Kultur und Verwaltung,” in Soziologische Schrift-
en 1, Gesammelte Schviften, vol. 8, pp. 122-146, and “Spatkapitalismus
oder Industriegesellachaft,” ibid., pp. 354-372.
43. M. Greiffenhagen, ed., Demokratisierung in Staat und Gesellschaft
(Munich, 1973); and H. von Hentig, Die Wiederherstellung der Politik
(Stuttgart, 1973).
44. {In the original there follow two paragraphs in which Habermas
outlines the contents of the book, acknowledges the contributions of R.
Dobert and K. Eder to the ideas developed therein, and again empha-
sizes their programmatic character.
]
Notes to “Toward a Reconstruction of Historical Materialism’

x. In the first part of The German Ideology and in the preface to A
Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy.
2. On the relationship of the assessments of historical materialism by
Marx and Engels, cf. L. Krader, Ethnologie und Anthropologie bei Marx
(Miinchen, 1973).