Page 278 - Computational Modeling in Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics
P. 278

Hyperthermia and ablation  267



















                   Figure 8.11 Basic models of array MW pin-applicators inserted in the target tissue (here, in the
                   shape of a cylinder); the models are built for FEM numerical analysis (Morega et al., 2014, 2015a).
                   FEM, Finite element method.

                   characteristics were examined in the study of Morega et al., (2008, 2014). Although
                   they provide a good technical solution to the temperature control problem (i.e., the
                   possibility of uniformly heating a predetermined volume) (Ito et al., 2001; Morega
                   et al., 2006; Saito et al., 2004), the array applicators come with the disadvantage of
                   increased discomfort or pain for the patient and contingent tissue damage through
                   bleeding and swelling (NIH); however, these inconveniencies are temporary whereas
                   the proceedings might be decisive.
                      The optimal design of the applicator translates here in choosing the best number of
                   components and the spacing between adjacent pins, conditions correlated with the
                   particular electrical and thermal behavior of the tissue, expressed by its physical proper-
                   ties for the specific operating frequency and temperature range (Andreuccetti et al.,
                   1997; Rosmann; Karampatzakis et al., 2013). The efficiency of the procedure is fur-
                   thermore conditioned by other characteristics of the electromagnetic radiation source:
                   waveform, power, phase-shift between individual pin emissions. Various combinations
                   could be tested and assessed with the help of an experimental model and even better
                   by numerical simulation. A numerical analysis was performed that way and the optimal
                   configuration for a three-pin applicator is shown in (Morega et al., 2006). Figure 8.12
                   illustrates, for comparison, the temperature distributions for a single-pin versus a three-
                   pins array applicator (same pin design), aimed for mild interstitial hyperthermia, but
                   scalable for ablation too.
                      For the three-pins array, the distance between adjacent pins was determined after
                   an optimization study, and it leads to an almost uniform temperature distribution in
                   the tissue encompassed by the pins. The three-pins are positioned at the vertices of an
                                                                                           3
                   equilateral triangle at 13 mm distance; the tissue volume of approx. 1,150 mm is

                   quasi-uniformly heated (42 C 43 C) within the therapeutic temperature range for

                   mild hyperthermia (Morega et al., 2006).
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283