Page 205 - Computational Retinal Image Analysis
P. 205

1  Introduction  201




                  a modified Chan-Vese model using texture features. In [27], edge detection and the
                    circular Hough transform are combined with an active shape model to extract the disc.
                  To overcome the limitations of pixel classification-based methods and deformable
                  model-based methods, we propose a superpixel classification-based method [10] and
                  combine it with the deformable model-based methods. With the rapid development of
                  convolutional neural network (CNN) in image and video processing [28], automatic
                  feature learning algorithms using deep learning have emerged as feasible approaches
                  for retinal image analysis. Recently, some OD segmentation algorithms [12, 29, 30]
                  based on deep learning, especially fully convolution network structure [31], have
                  been proposed. Sevastopolsky [30] adopted a modified U-Net to directly segment
                  the OD and optic cup for further CDR calculation and glaucoma diagnosis. In a
                  further extension of the U-Net, Fu [12] proposed a novel architecture called M-Net to
                  jointly segment OD and OC as well as a disc-aware method [29] for direct glaucoma
                  detection, where the OD segmentation is the of a series of operations. These methods
                  can greatly improve the performance of OD segmentation, based on the strong
                  learning capacity of deep learning.


                    Optic cup segmentation

                  Optic cup segmentation is another important task in retinal image analysis. Detecting
                  the cup boundary from 2D fundus images without depth information is a challenging
                  task as depth is the primary indicator for the cup boundary. In 2D fundus images, one
                  landmark to determine the cup region is the pallor, defined as the area of maximum
                  color contrast inside the disc [23]. Another landmark is the vessel bends at the
                  boundary of the cup [26, 32]. Compared with disc segmentation, fewer methods
                  have been proposed for cup segmentation from 2D fundus images. Thresholding is
                  used to determine the cup in [33–35], relying on intensity difference between cup
                  and neuroretinal rim. A level set-based approach is used in [36]. It relies on the edges
                  between cup and neuroretinal rim. This method and thresholding-based methods are
                  essentially based on pallor information. However, in many subjects from screening
                  data, there is no obvious pallor or edge within the disc to mark the cup boundary. In
                  [37], small vessel bends (“kinks”) near the initially estimated cup have been used to
                  aid the cup segmentation. The challenge is to exclude vessel bends from a boundary
                  not belonging to the cup, especially when the initial estimation is inaccurate. A similar
                  concept is used in [25] to locate relevant-vessel bends (“r-bend”) near a pallor region
                  determined by bright pixels. This method, again, requires the pallor information to
                  determine a good initial estimation of the cup boundary. Moreover, it requires at least
                  a few bends in the nasal, inferior and superior angular regions of the disc for the cup
                  boundary fitting, which is not necessarily true for many images in our experience.
                  Xu et al. [38] proposed a sliding window and regression-based method. Although this
                  performs better than earlier methods, the sliding window strategy imposes a heavy
                  computational cost. Yin et al. [39] developed a deformable model-based method for
                  cup segmentation, where the initialization of the cup boundary is based on pallor
                  combined with prior knowledge of the cup. Previously, superpixel classification was
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210