Page 36 - Crucial Conversations
P. 36

1 8    CRUCIAL CONVERSATIONS


     colleagues.  In fact, over the past twenty-five years,  we've asked
     over twenty thousand people to identif y   the individuals in their
     organizations  who  could  really  get  things  done.  We  wanted  to
    find those who were not just influential, but who were far more
     influential than the rest.
       Each time,  as  we  compiled  the  names  into  a  list,  a  pattern
     emerged.  Some  people  were  named  by  one  or  two  colleagues.
     Some found their way onto the lists of five or six people. These
     were  the  good  at  influence,  but  not good enough to  be widely
     identified  as  top  performers.  And  then  there  were  the  handful
     who were named  thirty or more times. These were the best-the
     clear opinion leaders  in  their  areas.  Some  were managers  and
     supervisors. Many were not.
       One of the opinion leaders we became particularly interested
     in meeting was named Kevin.  He was the only one of eight vice
     presidents  in his  company to  be identified as exceedingly influ­
     ential. We wanted to know why.  So we watched him at work.
       At first, Kevin didn't do anything remarkable. In truth, he looked
     like every other VP.  He  answered  his  phone,  talked  to  his  direct
     reports, and continued about his pleasant, but routine, routine.



     The Startling Discovery
     After trailing Kevin for almost a week, we began to wonder if he
     really  did  act  in  ways  that  set him  apart from others  or  if his
     influence  was  simply  a  matter  of popularity.  And  then  we  fol­
     lowed Kevin into a meeting.
       Kevin,  his peers, and their boss were deciding on  a new loca­
     tion for their offices-would  they move across  town,  across the
     state,  or  across  the  country?  The  first two execs  presented  their
     arguments for their top choices, and as expected, their points were
     greeted  by  penetrating  questions  from  the  full  team.  No  vague
     claim went unclarified, no unsupported reasoning unquestioned.
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41