Page 124 - Decoding Culture
P. 124

D
                                     RESISTING THE  O M  I N ANT  1 1 7
          into methodological difficulties, not least the tendency to seek to
          grasp, to understand in its totality, the entire experience of social
          and cultural processes and therefore to resist any form of analytical
          abstraction that might  serve  to break  down  those  processes into
          determinately related elements. Thus, the typical mode of under­
          standing fostered by this  (tacit) epistemology - seen, for example,
          in Williams' 'structures of feeling' - is expressive and experiential,
          tending to focus upon 'lived experience' at the expense of analytic
          understanding.
             To  this  developing  system  of ideas  Hall  counterposes  struc­
          turalism  or,  rather,  'the  stucturalisms'.  In  using  the  plural  he
          recognizes that the  structuralist tradition  is rather more varied
          than the culturalist, and takes to task, therefore, those theorists of
          the period who, much influenced by Althusser, saw the concept of
          ideology as integral to structuralism. Significantly, given Hall's and
          the eees' subsequent commitment to a form of cultural analysis in
          which ideology is a central concept, he stresses the importance of
          Levi-Strauss to the structuralist project. He singles out several fea­
          tures of Levi-Strauss' thought as being of particular significance:
          his concern with the production of meaning in signifying practices;
          his emphasis on culture rather than on ideology; and his applica­
          tion of a 'logic of arrangement' to the elements of a system rather
          than  a simple,  reductive  logic  of determinacy.  This  engagement
          with Levi-Strauss enables Hall to read Althusser in particular, and
          structuralism in general, as offering a rather richer approach to the
          problem of examining the determinate conditions of social life than
          was  apparent in  other  Althusser-influenced  work  of the  period.
          Furthermore, while avoiding the Lacanian turn in Screen theory's
          reading of Althusser, he is nonetheless able to retain a 'structural­
          ist' concept of ideology in which  signifying practices are  seen  to
          impose upon human agents an 'imaginary' relation to the real.
             In this context,  then,  Hall  goes  on to  consider  three positive





                              Copyrighted Material
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129