Page 129 - Decoding Culture
P. 129

122  D E C O D I N G   C U L TURE

           paradigm in media studies' which is concerned to understand the
           mechanisms by which ideological processes work, and the relation
           in which such processes stand to  'other practices within a social
           formation'  (ibid). Structuralism provides  Hall with a way into the
           first issue, its emphasis upon signification offering concepts appro­
           priate to grasping the ways in which systems of meaning ('cultural
           inventories' is one term Hall uses for them) are constructed around
           specific  events  and  how,  through  the  institutions  of the  mass
           media,  they are made  legitimate over and  above other possible
           constructions. Conflict over such processes is centrally important:
           ' [ tlhe  signification  of events is part of what has to  be  struggled
           over, for it is the means by which collective social understandings
           are created - and thus the means by which consent for particular
           outcomes can be effectively mobilized'  (ibid: 70).  Herein lies the
           'politics of signification'.  If privileged  meanings  are  sustained  by
           their framing within particular signifying structures, then contest­
           ing those meanings and revealing the significatory terms via which
           they come to be 'taken-for-granted' is a vital political function of any
           critical media studies.
             The difficulty with this structuralist-inspired conception is that
           its access to the 'deep structures' underlying diverse significatory
           processes is too formalistic to meet the historical needs of Hall's
           and the CCCS' commitment to a marxist analysis. Over the years,
           he  argues,  the  network  of presuppositions  on which  taken-for­
           grantedness  (or 'naturalization')  rests would change and develop
           through  'accretion'  and  'sedimentation',  and  any  proper under­
           standing of the workings of ideology would need to conceptualize
           these processes. In effect, it is necessary to historicize structural­
           ist method, replacing the timeless universalism of Uvi-Straussian
           myth analysis with a more historical conception. It is to Gramsci
           that  Hall  turns for  appropriate  terms,  invoking  his  concept  of
           'common  sense':  'the  inventory  of traditional  ideas,  the forms of





                              Copyrighted Material
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134