Page 128 - Decoding Culture
P. 128

RESISTIN G   THE  D O M  I N ANT  121

          Nevertheless, by the early 1980s a broad consensus was emerging
          on the utility of the Gramscian way of framing a theory of ideology,
          the principal features  of  which  can  be  seen  in  Hall's well-known
          attempt to formulate these ideas in the cause of a critical approach
          to media studies (Hall, 1982). I shall use this discussion as an initial
          focus for my account of CCCS views on the role of ideology in cul­
          ture and in cultural studies more generally.
            Hall's  argument - as  so  often  in  his work  of this period - is
          directed at our ways of understanding the role of the mass media
          in  modern  societies.  He locates  the  orthodox  (behavioural  and
          effects) tradition of mass communications research in the context
          of the rise to dominance in the 1950s of pluralism as the social sci­
          ence  model  of modern industrial  society.  In this  account,  there
          were social and political conflicts, certainly, but all regulated and
          contained  within  a  framework  of broad  consensus.  The  mass
          media functioned as a channel of influence, both in processes of
          pluralist decision making and, more generally, as an expression of
          the overall consensus. As the 1960s progressed, however, doubts
          of various kinds emerged from within pluralist social science about
          the nature of the presumed consensus and the terms of its forma­
          tion, and about the ways in which the media's 'signifying practices'
          defined rather than  simply reproduced  or 'reflected' reality.  For
          Hall  (others  have  charted  it  differently)  this  growing  dissent
          pointed to a common concern with the 'ideological dimension' of
          social life which he understood as involving 'the winning of a uni­
          versal validity and legitimacy for accounts of the world which are
          partial  and  particular,  and to  the grounding  of these  particular
          constructions  in  the  taken-for-grantedness of "the  real'"  (Hall,
          1982:  65). What pluralism conceived of as a kind of 'natural' con­
          sent, critical frameworks were to analyse as  an  achievement of
          ideology.
            This  signals  the  emergence  of  what  he  calls  'the  critical





                              Copyrighted Material
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133