Page 131 - Decoding Culture
P. 131

124  D E C O D I N G   C U L TURE

           for  example,  with  that  found  in  one of the  best-known  CCCS
           products  of the mid-1970s:  Resistance  through  Rituals  (Hall  and
           Jefferson,  1976). The lengthy theoretical overview which begins
           that volume (Clarke et al. , 1976) is in no doubt about the centrality
           of class to its project.  'In modern societies, the most fundamental
           groups are the social classes, and the major cultural configurations
           will be, in  a fundamental  though  often mediated way,  "class cul­
           tures'"  (Clarke  et al.,  1976:  13). As is well known,  they go on  to
           conceptualize working-class youth subcultures in terms of domi­
           nance  and  subordination,  examining their double  articulation  in
           relation  to both  the  parent working-class culture  and the 'hege­
           monic' dominant  culture.  Ideology is  drawn  into  the  picture  in
           terms that owe a good deal to Althusser, in as much as subcultures
           are seen to 'solve' problems of material relations in an 'imaginary'
           way.  This  view  is  supported  by  the  familiar  passage  from
           Althusser's F o r Marx: 'in ideology men do indeed express, not the
           real relation between them and their conditions of existence,  but
           the way they live the relation between them and the conditions of
           their existence' (quoted in Clarke et al.,  1976: 48).
             Gramsci, too, is introduced in familiar terms. 'Hegemony works
           through  ideology,  but  it  does  not consist of false  ideas,  percep­
           tions,  definitions.  It works primarily by inserting the subordinate
           class  into  the  key  institutions and  structures which  support the
           power and social authority of the dominant order. It is, above all, in
           these structures and relations that a subordinate class lives its sub­
           ordination' (ibid: 39). Note the emphasis on class here. Hegemonic
           domination requires consent, secured in civil society through class
           leadership,  a process exemplified  in  1950s Britain where it was
           'the role of "affluence", as an ideology, to dismantle working-class
           resistance and deliver the "spontaneous consent" of the class to the
           authority of the dominant classes'  (ibid: 40). On this cultural terrain
           there is resistance, negotiation and struggle as well as dominance,





                              Copyrighted Material
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136