Page 19 - Decoding Culture
P. 19

12  DECODING CULTURE

          the beginning of the 1970s it was clear that 'structuralism' alone
          was  insufficient.  Although  it  had  provided a  method  of  analysis
          appropriate for a cultural studies with ambitions to examine a wide
          range of forms of culture, that analysis was now in need of theo­
          retical  and  empirical  integration  into  a  larger  account  of. the
          contexts of communication.
            The search for that larger account  is  reflected here,  as it was
          elsewhere, in the move from 'structuralism' to 'post-structuralism',
          and  it was to  generate  the basic  theoretical  terms in which  the
          nascent discipline would come into its own. It is at this point in my
          narrative that we reach a major parting of the ways in cultural stud­
          ies.  One  form  of  post-structuralism - that  associated  with  the
          journal  Screen  and  referred to  here  as  'Screen  theory' - would
          embrace an essentially psychoanalytic approach to  the  constitu­
          tion of subjectivity, while a second - developed mainly in the work
          of the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies - would lean on
          Gramscian theories of hegemony in their analysis of the social and
          historical role of cultural forms. Both positions saw ideology as a
          key  concept  and  both  laid  claim to  historical  materialism  as  an
          informing perspective. But the modes of analysis to which their dif­
          ferent  post-structuralisms  gave  rise  would  develop  into  two
          contrasting approaches to cultural studies.
            In Screen  theory  (the main focus of Chapter 4)  the key ideas
          were derived from Althusser's theory of ideology and focused upon
          the capacity of texts and discourses to position  'readers' as partic­
          ular subjects. By being constituted as a certain kind of subject by
          cultural  materials,  an  individual  was  caught  within  ideology.
          Accordingly, texts  were to be analysed with a view to uncovering
          these processes of 'interpellation': the ways in which our sense of
          ourselves as distinctive subjects was constructed through and by
          the systems of discourse that made up our culture. How best to the­
          orize such processes of subject constitution? For Screen  theory it





                              Copyrighted Material
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24