Page 23 - Decoding Culture
P. 23

16  DECODING CULTURE

          decline  by  mid-decade  and,  reacting  against  the  perceived
         excesses of the past, researchers turned their attention away from
          the ideological power of texts and toward the individual pleasures
          and interpretive freedom of readers. Although the full implications
          of this shift are still not clear, two somewhat different ways of con­
          sidering readership can be discerned. In one, so-called 'audience
          ethnography', the primary emphasis is methodological. By study­
          ing people's reading practices in considerable empirical detail, this
          approach seeks to  do  justice to  the contextual richness  of their
          responses.  Qualitative  interviewing  and participant observation
          have become preferred methods here, with 'thick description' the
          analytic goal. In the other, to which the label 'cultural populism' has
          been  applied,  the  main  focus  is upon  readers'  capacity  to  resist
          social pressures through inventive appropriation of culture. Critics
          of this view (and there are many) argue that in attending so single­
          mindedly to processes of cultural consumption, the theory tumbles
          by  default  into  an uncritical celebration of  popular  culture.  The
          radical theories from which cultural  studies drew  strength  and
          originality 20 years ago are thus left high and dry. Indeed, some of
          those most dismayed by this turn of events have gone so far as to
          suggest that, in consequence, 1990s cultural studies faces a para­
          digm  crisis.  That  may  well  be  so,  though,  as  I  shall  argue  in
          Chapter 7, the causes and character of the 'crisis' are not as simple
          as that.
            I am acutely aware of the limitations of the  abbreviated  story
          that I have just told. It omits whole sub-plots, its characters are little
          more than cardboard, and it has no clear ending. However, treated
          generously  it  will serve as an introductory outline for the  much
          fuller account that is to follow. Because of the starkness of its sim­
          plification  it also  helps to foreground the one  very  general issue
          that has informed every stage in the development of cultural stud­
          ies. I described this earlier as the tension between the structuring





                              Copyrighted Material
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28