Page 21 - Decoding Culture
P. 21

14  DECODING CULTURE
          text-driven  model  that  Screen  had  derived  from Althusser  and
          Lacan. For the CCCS, culture was a site of constant conflict, a sig­
          nificatory terrain across which attempts to secure hegemony - in
          effect, domination by consent of the dominated - were variously
          resisted. Class remained a key concept. Although it was increas­
          ingly recognized that gender and race were important structuring
          features of social life, in its main period of influence the CCCS was
          committed to class-based analysis first and foremost. That was in
          the late 1970s and early 1980s, at which time both the Centre and
          its then Director, Stuart Hall, produced a remarkable body of work.
          Hall in particular pushed cultural studies theory forward; and the
          series of papers that he published during this period are probably
          the most influential cultural studies writing to come from the pen of
          a single individual.
            In spite of the quality of that work, however, it became apparent
          in the course of the Thatcherite 1980s that something was amiss
          with this neo-Gramscian synthesis.  Doubts had been  growing in
          the social sciences and humanities about the effectiveness of class­
          based general  theories,  and  it  was also  becoming  clear  that  the
          polysemic potential of culture - its inherent capacity for multiple
          meanings and ambiguity - was significantly greater than even the
          CCCS  model  could  encompass.  Saussurian  structuralism  had
          always recognized that semiotic systems were complex and under­
          determined,  by  their  very  nature  open  to  plural  'readings'  -
          although language systems did indeed set limits on communication
          processes,  they were rarely  simple or straightforward enough to
          do so unambiguously.  However,  in embedding structuralism in a
          context that viewed culture as ideology, as a key element in secur­
          ing  hegemony,  the  CCCS framework  was  obliged  to  minimize
          these  polysemic  aspects  of communication.  How else could  the
          dominant  ideology  be  effective?  Accordingly,  CCCS  thinking
          sought to understand the relationship between cultural texts and





                              Copyrighted Material
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26