Page 62 - Decoding Culture
P. 62

ENTER STRUCTURALISM     55

          linguistics is langue has radical consequences for the study of lan­
          guage.  It underlines the irreducibly social character of language,
          an achievement in itself, but it also gives much greater force to the
          argument for the  necessity  of theory  and,  thereby,  to  a  more
          deductively inclined epistemology than was common in nineteenth­
          century thought. Since langue is the 'absent' system which makes
          speech  possible,  it  cannot  be  apprehended  directly  but  only
          through  its instantiations in speech. In effect,  then, the study of
          langue requires us to develop theoretical models of its systems of
          codes and conventions and to demonstrate that such models ade­
          quately capture the capacity of language systems to enable speech.
          And although  Saussure  himself  (in the passage quoted  earlier)
          writes  of discovering 'forces  operating universally'  and  'general
          laws' when he characterizes the goals of linguistics, the thrust of
          his  detailed  analysis  suggests  a  rather  more  holistic  relation
          between model and evidence than might be expected from such a
          mechanistically influenced view of science.  It is the  system as  a
          whole which enables speech, and its systemic quality cannot, with­
          out loss,  be  reduced  to  the  propositional form characteristic  of
          sciences primarily concerned to establish law statements. I am not
          suggesting here that Saussure consciously anticipated changes in
          scientific epistemology which would only become clear later in the
          century  - only that  part of the  innovative  quality  of his  work  is
          that in its conceptual apparatus it presupposes a view of theory and
          method which, at that time, was still relatively undeveloped.
            He is also fully aware that the argument he advances for the
          study of langue is more generally applicable to other systems of
          signs. 'A language is a system of signs expressing ideas, and hence
          comparable to writing, the deaf-and-dumb alphabet, symbolic rites,
          forms of politeness,  military  signals,  and  so  on.  It is simply the
          most important of such systems'  (ibid:  15 .   He envisages the pos­
                                             )
          sibility  of a  science  which  will  examine  all these  sign-systems,





                              Copyrighted Material
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67