Page 63 - Decoding Culture
P. 63

56  D E CODING CULTURE

           studying their role in social life. This as yet non-existent science he
           calls semiology, and he conceives it as part of social psychology.
           Natural language is a special type of system within this semiologi­
           cal domain, and his interest in it - and, presumably, the conceptual
           apparatus that he develops for analysing language - is essentially
           semiological.  That  is,  he is  first  of  all  concerned  to  understand
           those features that are common to all systems of signification. Any
           system of  signs  functions as a communicative  process  in conse­
           quence of its own structuring system - its langue-like set of codes
           and conventions - and the task of semiology is to explore the oper­
           ation of such systems in their social context.
             This  immediately  raises  the  question  of  what  is  to  constitute
           the basic unit of a semiological system - namely, what is a sign?
           Saussure's  answer  involves  a  further  famous  distinction,  that
           between signijie and signifiant or, in the now conventional English
           rendering, signified and signifier respectively. The linguistic sign,
           Saussure argues, is double-sided, always containing two elements.
           It does not connect a name to an object, as some correspondence
           views have tended to suggest, but links the concept carried by the
           sign  with  the  sound-pattern  through  which  the  sign  is  given
           expression. To avoid ambiguity, Saussure replaces 'sound-pattern'
           and 'concept' with the more abstract terms 'signifier' and 'signified',
           a choice which also has the effect of highlighting the applicability
           of this distinction to all significatory systems and not just to the lin­
           guistic  sign.  Whatever the  concrete  material  of  which  they  are
           composed, all signs involve both a signified and a signifier.
             This  leads  on  to  a  key  claim  given  succinct  expression  in
           Saussure's  blunt declaration that  'the  linguistic  sign is arbitrary'
           (ibid: 67). When first encountered this assertion can seem rather
           puzzling,  partly  because  of  the  overtones  of randomness  in the
           word 'arbitrary', something of which Saussure was himself aware.
           To  clarify  his  claim,  he  expands  on the  idea of  arbitrariness  in





                              Copyrighted Material
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68