Page 64 - Decoding Culture
P. 64

ENTER STRUCTURAUSM  57
          terms of seeing the signifier as unmotivated, as having no 'natural'
          connection to the signified. The idea 'cat' has no intrinsic link with
          the sequence of sounds c-a-t; the connection is conventional and
          has been socially established. Of course, there are systems using
          signs that are to some degree non-arbitrary or 'natural'. Saussure
          mentions mime as an example, and later in the Cours finds it nec­
          essary to distinguish between absolute and relative arbitrariness,
          conceding even that 'the sign may be motivated to a certain extent'
          (ibid:  130). Interestingly,  this problem was  to re-emerge in later
          applications of semiology in cultural studies, where, for instance,
          considerable energies were devoted to considering whether and in
          what degree the relation of photographic  (and cinematic)  signi­
          fiers  to  their signifieds  could be described  as  arbitrary.  But  the
          more immediate significance of Saussure's concept of the arbitrary
          sign is twofold: it again underscores the socially relative character
          of signification systems,  and  it leads us toward a concept of lan­
          guage as a relational system of differences.
            On the former, this passage sums up the generality and social
          significance of the claim of arbitrariness:

            the main object of study in semiology will  [none the less]  be the
            class of systems based upon the arbitrary nature of the sign. For
            any  means  of expression  accepted  in  a society  rests  in  principle
            upon a collective habit, or on convention, which comes to the same
            thing.  Signs of  politeness,  for  instance,  although  often  endowed
            with  a certain  natural  expressiveness  (prostrating  oneself  nine
            times on the ground is the way to greet an emperor in China)  are
            none the less fixed by rule. It is this rule which renders them oblig­
            atory,  not  their  intrinsic  value.  W e   may  therefore say  that  signs
            which  are  entirely  arbitrary convey  better  than  others  the  ideal
            semiological process.  (ibid: 68)

          This 'ideal semiological process' rests on a langue, of course, and is
          composed  of  elements  carrying  meaning  by  virtue  of  their





                              Copyrighted Material
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69