Page 201 - Design for Environment A Guide to Sustainable Product Development
P. 201

180    Cha pte r  Ni ne

                    • Global warming potential due to the build-up of greenhouse
                      gases, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide.
                    • Acidification due to emissions that increase the acidity of
                      water and soil systems.
                    • Eutrophication, meaning excessive plant growth (e.g., algae)
                      in surface waters due to elevated nutrient levels caused by
                      fertilizer runoff.
                    • Tropospheric ozone formation (i.e., smog) due to emissions
                      of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds, which is
                      detrimental to human health and ecosystems.
                    • Human health criteria pollutants, including particulates that
                      may cause respiratory diseases such as asthma.
                    • Human health impacts due to chemical releases that may
                      cause cancer and other chronic diseases.
                    • Ecotoxicity due to chemical releases that may harm organ-
                      isms either through direct toxicity or ecological damage.
                   Based on the above categories, using simplified impact assess-
               ment coefficients, it is possible to derive relative comparisons of
               design options in terms of their potential adverse effects on humans or
               the environment. To assess the actual risks of such effects requires
               more detailed environmental risk assessment methods, as described
               below under Risk Analysis.

               Streamlined LCA
               Because of the limitations mentioned above, many LCA practition -
               ers have turned toward simplified LCA tools that provide results
               more quickly, with less effort, and also with less precision. Espe-
               cially in the early stages of product development, such tools may be
               more appropriate for rapid design iteration. Alternative approaches
               have emerged that are more comprehensive and more streamlined,
               al though less fine-grained than conventional LCA. For example,
               Carnegie Mellon University developed a tool that uses aggregate
               input-output data to model the entire economy from a top-down per-
               spective [16]. Such methods provide a useful complement to detailed,
               bottom-up LCA. In particular, since streamlined LCA requires only
               basic data about resource inputs, it is helpful in assessing new prod-
               ucts when emissions data are not yet available. Streamlined methods
               can also be combined with detailed methods through “hybrid” LCA
               studies, which embed a focused LCA for specific industrial processes
               within a broader “envelope” representing the rest of the economy.
                 Example: The Ohio State University has developed an online tool called Eco-
                 LCA™ that combines an economic input-output model of 488 sectors of the
                 U.S. economy with an ecological resource consumption model based on exergy
                 analysis, as described below. This tool enables immediate assessment or
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206