Page 146 - Design for Six Sigma for Service (Six SIGMA Operational Methods)
P. 146

Quality Function Deployment  121

        from further deployment if they do not relate to basic quality or performance
        attributes in the Kano model. The theme of DFSS is to be customer driven
        and to work on the right items; otherwise, we are creating a design “hidden
        factory.”


        In our example, the CTS requirement “Adequate follow-up” is weak (rated
        13 on the importance rating). However, the What “Easy to use products” has
        no strong relationship with any CTS requirements and eliminating
        “Adequate follow-up” may weaken the delivery of this What even further.

        Conflicts
        The DFSS team needs to look for cases where technical benchmarking rates
        their product or service high but the customer assessment is low. Miscon-
        ceptions of customer attributes is the major root cause of these cases. The
        team together with marketing can remedy these situations.

        In our example, “Cost-effective products,” a What, is addressed by many CTS
        requirements including “Save money and enhance productivity.” The customer
        rates our product as weak (rating 2), while the technical assessment is rated the
        highest (rating 4). Who is right? Conflicts may be a result of a failure to
        understand the customer and must be resolved prior to further progress.

        Strengths
        By identifying the CTS requirements that contain the most 9 ratings, the DFSS
        team pinpoints which CTS requirements have a significant impact on the total
        design. Changes in these characteristics will greatly affect the design, and such
        effects propagate via the correlation matrix to other CTS requirements causing
        positive and negative implications. The following CTS requirements are sig-
        nificant as implied by their importance ratings and number of 9 ratings in their
        relationships to Whats: “Meet the expectations,” “Know my business and
        offers,” “Save money and enhance Productivity,” “Do it right the first time,”
        and “Know our products and processes.” Examining the correlation matrix
        (Fig. 6.9), we have positive correlation all over except in the cell “Do it right
        the first time” and “Meet time expectations.”

        Eye-Openers
        The DFSS team should look at customer attributes where
          1. Their design as well as their competitors are performing poorly
          2. The Whats are performing poorly compared to their competitors for
             benchmarking
          3. CTS requirements need further development in phase 2
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151