Page 199 - Design for Six Sigma for Service (Six SIGMA Operational Methods)
P. 199

170   Chapter Seven

        and power to be unequally distributed. This observation has been refined to
        the degree that it can be said that there is an 80/20 percent relationship
        between similar elements.

        For example, 20 percent of the parts in an assembly contain 80 percent of
        the cost. This is very useful information in cost estimating; however, the
        relationship holds for many diverse examples such as the following:
            Twenty percent of the states use 80 percent of the fuel oil.
            Twenty percent of the activities create 80 percent of the budgeted
              expense.
            Twenty percent of the items sold generate 80 percent of the profit.
        In value engineering it is frequently necessary to select the best ideas, the
        highest value functions, the highest potential projects, or any of a number of
        other requirements. It has been found that the application of Pareto voting
        can help to simplify the list and will, in most cases, ensure that the most
        important items have been selected. It also produces results quickly and can
        be incorporated into the value-engineering process to allow continuous
        operations without undue disruptions.

        Pareto voting is conducted by requesting each team member to select what
        they believe are the items or elements that have the greatest effect on the
        system. This list of items is limited to 20 percent of the total number of
        items. For example, each team member would be allowed to select 6 items
        out of a list of 30. The vote is taken on an individual basis to obtain as much
        objectivity as possible.
        The resultant lists are then compared and arranged into a new consolidated
        list, in descending order, by the number of votes each item received. Usually,
        several items will have been selected by two or more team members. The top
        10 to 15 items are then ranked and weighted in a second step by using paired
        comparisons.

            Example 7.7: Pareto Voting
            This example refers to the idea generation form used in Table 7.10. A team
            of six people will conduct a Pareto voting on the nine ideas; each member
            can only vote for two ideas, so a total of 12 votes will be received. The
            number of votes for each idea will be tallied; the result is summarized in
            Table 7.15.


        Paired Comparisons
        Paired comparisons, or numerical evaluation as it is sometimes called,
        compares a list of items to rank and weights them in order of importance or
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204