Page 169 - Designing Sociable Robots
P. 169

breazeal-79017  book  March 18, 2002  14:7





                       150                                                              Chapter 9





                       the robot. In addition, Kismet vocalizes excitedly, which is perceived as an initiation. The
                       FSM transitions to the second state (2) upon the completion of this gesture. In this state, the
                       robot “sits back” and waits for a bit with an expectant expression (ears slightly perked, eyes
                       slightly widened, and brows raised). If the person has not already approached the robot, it is
                       likely to occur during this “anticipation” phase. If the person does not approach within the
                       allotted time period, the FSM transitions to the third state (3) where face relaxes, the robot
                       maintains a neutral posture, and gaze fixation is released. At this point, the robot is able to
                       shift gaze. As long as this FSM is active (determined by the behavior system), the calling
                       cycle repeats. It can be interrupted at any state transition by the activation of another FSM
                       (such as the greeting FSM when the person has approached). Chapter 10 presents a table
                       and summary of FAPs that have been implemented on Kismet.


                       9.6  Playful Interactions with Kismet

                       The behavior system implements the four classes of proto-social responses. The robot dis-
                       plays affective responses by changing emotive facial expressions in response to stimulus
                       quality and internal state. These expressions relate to goal achievement, emotive reactions,
                       and reflections of the robot’s state of “well-being.” The exploratory responses include vi-
                       sual search for desired stimuli, orientation, and maintenance of mutual regard. Kismet has
                       a variety of protective responses that serve to distance the robot from offending stimuli.
                       Finally, the robot has a variety of regulatory responses that bias the caregiver to provide
                       the appropriate level and kinds of interactions at the appropriate times. These are commu-
                       nicated to the caregiver through carefully timed social displays as well as affective facial
                       expressions. The organization of the behavior system addresses the issues of relevancy,
                       coherency, persistence, flexibility, and opportunism. The proto-social responses address the
                       issues of believability, promoting empathy, expressiveness, and conveying intentionality.
                       Regulating Interaction

                       Figure 9.9 shows Kismet responding to a toy with these four response types. The robot
                       begins the trial looking for a toy and displaying sadness (an affective response). The robot
                       immediately begins to move its eyes searching for a colorful toy stimulus (an exploratory
                       response) (t < 10). When the caregiver presents a toy (t ≈ 13), the robot engages in a play
                       behavior and the stimulation-drive becomes satiated (t ≈ 20). As the caregiver moves
                       the toy back and forth (20 < t < 35), the robot moves its eyes and neck to maintain the
                       toy within its field of view. When the stimulation becomes excessive (t ≈ 35), the robot
                       becomes first “displeased” and then “fearful” as the stimulation-drive moves into
                       the overwhelmed regime. After extreme over-stimulation, a protective escape response
                       produces a large neck movement (t = 38), which removes the toy from the field of view.
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174