Page 133 - Effective Communication Soft Skills Strategies For Success by Nitin Bhatnagar, Mamta Bhatnagar
P. 133

Project Name:  Manual for Soft Skills
                                                                                  ACE Pro India Pvt. Ltd.
             \\mtpdy01\Womat\Indesign\Bhatnagar-Manual for Soft skills\06-Pagination\06-A-Finals\06-AA-Appl\Bhatnagar_Chapter 06.indd



                                                              Psychology and Communication    |    121

                            a  decoder  perspective,  examining  how  receivers  use  the  same  signals  to
                            form judgments of communicators. Impression management returns to an
                            encoder perspective, examining the ways in which communicators strategi-
                            cally craft their nonverbal performances to create desired images projecting
                            ‘who they want to be’.
                                The flip side of impression formation is impression management. How
                            can  communicators  use  nonverbal  cues  to  foster  desired  impressions?
                            Impression management is often, but not always, strategic—strategies which
                            a communicator can use to project desired images along dimensions of believ-
                            ability, expertise, attraction, status, etc. Impression management is strategic
                            self-presentation which centres on those features of behaviour affected by
                            power augmentation motives designed to elicit or shape others’ attributions
                            of the actor’s dispositions. Simply put, it is also described as communicative
                            behaviours that people use to regulate their social identity.
                                An individual’s attempt at impression management may not always be
                            successful. According to violations theory of Burgoons (1993), the impres-
                            sion can be negative if the individual violates expectations. Central to the
                            theory are two premises: (a) nonverbal behaviours engender strong expec-
                            tations that govern interaction patterns and outcomes, and (b) nonverbal
                            behaviours have message value. When meanings are unequivocal and/or
                            congruent, a social meaning model prevails such that interpretations and
                            evaluations associated with the behaviours are predicted to influence out-
                            comes directly.
                                When meanings are ambiguous or conflicting, communicator reward
                            valence is posited to moderate the cognitive-affective assessment process.
                            Communicator reward valence is a summary term for all the combined
                            communicator  characteristics  that,  on  balance,  cause  the  communicator
                            to be regarded positively; characteristics that, on balance, cause the com-
                            municator to be regarded positively or negatively. The interpretation and
                            evaluation process results in a net valence for the nonverbal act. Positively
                            valenced  act  produces  positive  outcomes,  and  negatively  valenced  act
                            results in negative outcomes. Violations of expectations are hypothesized
                            to intensify this process by causing an intentional shift to the source of the
                              violations  and  the  behaviours  themselves,  thus,  making  communicator
                            characteristics more salient.
                                In conclusion, we can summarize the ‘expectancy violation theory’ in
                            terms of impression management strategy in the following ways:

                                1.   Proximics  violations  and  non-intimate  touch  promote  favourable
                                  impressions  of  positively  valanced  communicators  but  undermine
                                  impressions of negatively valenced communicators.
                                2.   Increases  beyond  normative  levels  in  conversational  involvement
                                  and immediacy behaviours such as gaze are positive violations that






       Bhatnagar_Chapter 06.indd   121                                                   2011-06-23   7:56:44 PM
             Modified Date: Tue, Jun 21, 2011 11:33:24 AM             Output Date: Thu, Jun 23, 2011 07:56:43 PM
             TEMPLATE                                                                Page Number:  PB
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138