Page 184 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 184

Communication and Group Culture            167

                      53.  Henry M. Robert, Robert’s Rules of Order Newly    66.  Gully, Devine, and Whitney, “A Meta-Analysis of
                        Revised (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1990):   Cohesion and Performance.”
                        471–521.                                   67.  M. E. Johnson and J. G. Fortman, “Internal
                      54.  Susan B. Shimanoff, “Coordinating Group    Structure of the Gross Cohesiveness Scale,” Small
                        Interaction via Communication Rules,” in Small   Group Behavior, 19 (February 1988): 187–96.
                        Group Communication: A Reader, 6th ed., eds.    68.  Lynne Kelly and Robert L. Duran, “Interaction and
                        Robert S. Cathcart and Larry A. Samovar       Performance in Small Groups: A Descriptive
                        (Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown, 1992): 255.       Report,” International Journal of Small Group
                      55.  Ana M. Velásquez, Kate-Mills Drury, Lina   Research, 1 (1985): 182–92.
                        M. Saldarriaga, Jonathan B. Santo, Luz Stella-   69.  Charles N. Greene, “Cohesion and Productivity in
                        Lopez, and William M. Bukowski, “Peer Rejection   Work Groups,” Small Group Behavior, 20 (1989):
                        as a Social Regulation Mechanism of Group Norms:   70–86.
                        The Case of Aggression Across Sex,” Journal of    70.  Wood, “Challenging the Assumptions.”
                        Latino/Latin-American Studies, 8 (2016): 47–58.   71.  Frederick G. Elias, Mark E. Johnson, and Jay
                      56.  Tom Postmes, Russell Spears, and Lea Martin,   B. Fortman, “Task-Focused Self-Disclosure: Effects
                        “The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-    on Group Cohesiveness, Commitment to the Task,
                        Mediated Communication,” Human Communication   and Productivity,” Small Group Behavior, 20 (1989):
                        Research, 26 (July 3): 341–71.                87–96.
                      57.  J. Dan Rothwell, In Mixed Company, 4th ed. (Fort    72.  William F. Owen, “Metaphor Analysis of
                        Worth, TX: Harcourt, 2001): 63.               Cohesiveness in Small Discussion Groups,” Small
                      58.  Steven Beebe and John Masterson, Communicating   Group Behavior, 16 (1985): 415–26.
                        in Small Groups, 6th ed. (New York: Addison-   73.  Amy L. Gonzales, Jeffrey T. Hancock, and James
                        Wesley, 1999): 82–83.                         W. Pennebaker, “Language Style Matching as a
                      59.  Gay Lumsden and Donald Lumsden,            Predictor of Social Dynamics in Small Groups,”
                        Communicating in Groups and Teams, 3rd ed.    Communication Research, 37 (February
                        (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning,     2010): 3–19.
                        2000): 281.                                74.  Barker, “The Behavioral Analysis of Interpersonal
                      60.  Poole, “Group Communication and the Structuring   Intimacy.”
                        Process.”                                  75.  Synthesized from Ernest G. Bormann and Nancy
                      61.  http://www.espn.com/nba/playoffs/2016/story/_/  C. Bormann, Effective Small Group Communication,
                        id/16362353/nba-finals-2016-lebron-james-cleve-  2nd ed. (Minneapolis: Burgess, 1976): 70–76; and
                        land-cavaliers-bask-nba-title-glory, accessed   Gloria J. Galanes (unpublished research based on
                        6/3/2017.                                     interviews with peer-nominated excellent leaders,
                      62.  David B. Barker, “The Behavioral Analysis of   2002).
                        Interpersonal Intimacy in Group Development,”    76.  Vanessa Urch Druskat and D. Christopher Kayes,
                        Small Group Research, 22 (February 1991): 76–91.  “Learning versus Performance in Short-Term
                      63.  Carolyn M. Anderson, Bruce L. Riddle, and   Project Teams,” Small Group Research, 31 (June
                        Dominic A. Infante, “Decision-Making Collaboration   2000): 328–53.
                        Scale: Tests of Validity,” Communication Research    77.  Larson and LaFasto, Teamwork; Frank LaFasto and
                        Reports, 15 (1999): 245–55.                   Carl Larson, When Teams Work Best: 6,000 Team
                      64.  Harold L. Nixon II, The Small Group (Englewood   Members and Leaders Tell What It Takes to Succeed
                        Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1979): 74–76.      (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001): 65–83.
                      65.  Charles R. Evans and Kenneth L. Dion, “Group    78.  Anthony M. Townsend and Samuel M. DeMarie,
                        Cohesion and Performance,” Small Group Behavior,   “Are You Ready for Virtual Teams?” HR Magazine,
                        22 (1991): 175–86; Stanley M. Gully, Dennis   41 (September 1996): np; accessed via EBSCOhost
                        J. Devine, and David J. Whitney, “A Meta-Analysis   on World Wide Web, August 2, 2002.
                        of Cohesion and Performance: Effects of Level of    79.  Stefanie K. Johnson, Kenneth Bettenhausen, and
                        Analysis and Task Interdependence,” Small Group   Ellie Gibbons, “Realities of Working in Virtual
                        Research, 26 (November 1995): 497–520.        Teams: Affective and Attitudinal Outcomes of









          gal37018_ch06_135_168.indd   167                                                              3/28/18   12:36 PM
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189