Page 184 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 184
Communication and Group Culture 167
53. Henry M. Robert, Robert’s Rules of Order Newly 66. Gully, Devine, and Whitney, “A Meta-Analysis of
Revised (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1990): Cohesion and Performance.”
471–521. 67. M. E. Johnson and J. G. Fortman, “Internal
54. Susan B. Shimanoff, “Coordinating Group Structure of the Gross Cohesiveness Scale,” Small
Interaction via Communication Rules,” in Small Group Behavior, 19 (February 1988): 187–96.
Group Communication: A Reader, 6th ed., eds. 68. Lynne Kelly and Robert L. Duran, “Interaction and
Robert S. Cathcart and Larry A. Samovar Performance in Small Groups: A Descriptive
(Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown, 1992): 255. Report,” International Journal of Small Group
55. Ana M. Velásquez, Kate-Mills Drury, Lina Research, 1 (1985): 182–92.
M. Saldarriaga, Jonathan B. Santo, Luz Stella- 69. Charles N. Greene, “Cohesion and Productivity in
Lopez, and William M. Bukowski, “Peer Rejection Work Groups,” Small Group Behavior, 20 (1989):
as a Social Regulation Mechanism of Group Norms: 70–86.
The Case of Aggression Across Sex,” Journal of 70. Wood, “Challenging the Assumptions.”
Latino/Latin-American Studies, 8 (2016): 47–58. 71. Frederick G. Elias, Mark E. Johnson, and Jay
56. Tom Postmes, Russell Spears, and Lea Martin, B. Fortman, “Task-Focused Self-Disclosure: Effects
“The Formation of Group Norms in Computer- on Group Cohesiveness, Commitment to the Task,
Mediated Communication,” Human Communication and Productivity,” Small Group Behavior, 20 (1989):
Research, 26 (July 3): 341–71. 87–96.
57. J. Dan Rothwell, In Mixed Company, 4th ed. (Fort 72. William F. Owen, “Metaphor Analysis of
Worth, TX: Harcourt, 2001): 63. Cohesiveness in Small Discussion Groups,” Small
58. Steven Beebe and John Masterson, Communicating Group Behavior, 16 (1985): 415–26.
in Small Groups, 6th ed. (New York: Addison- 73. Amy L. Gonzales, Jeffrey T. Hancock, and James
Wesley, 1999): 82–83. W. Pennebaker, “Language Style Matching as a
59. Gay Lumsden and Donald Lumsden, Predictor of Social Dynamics in Small Groups,”
Communicating in Groups and Teams, 3rd ed. Communication Research, 37 (February
(Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2010): 3–19.
2000): 281. 74. Barker, “The Behavioral Analysis of Interpersonal
60. Poole, “Group Communication and the Structuring Intimacy.”
Process.” 75. Synthesized from Ernest G. Bormann and Nancy
61. http://www.espn.com/nba/playoffs/2016/story/_/ C. Bormann, Effective Small Group Communication,
id/16362353/nba-finals-2016-lebron-james-cleve- 2nd ed. (Minneapolis: Burgess, 1976): 70–76; and
land-cavaliers-bask-nba-title-glory, accessed Gloria J. Galanes (unpublished research based on
6/3/2017. interviews with peer-nominated excellent leaders,
62. David B. Barker, “The Behavioral Analysis of 2002).
Interpersonal Intimacy in Group Development,” 76. Vanessa Urch Druskat and D. Christopher Kayes,
Small Group Research, 22 (February 1991): 76–91. “Learning versus Performance in Short-Term
63. Carolyn M. Anderson, Bruce L. Riddle, and Project Teams,” Small Group Research, 31 (June
Dominic A. Infante, “Decision-Making Collaboration 2000): 328–53.
Scale: Tests of Validity,” Communication Research 77. Larson and LaFasto, Teamwork; Frank LaFasto and
Reports, 15 (1999): 245–55. Carl Larson, When Teams Work Best: 6,000 Team
64. Harold L. Nixon II, The Small Group (Englewood Members and Leaders Tell What It Takes to Succeed
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1979): 74–76. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001): 65–83.
65. Charles R. Evans and Kenneth L. Dion, “Group 78. Anthony M. Townsend and Samuel M. DeMarie,
Cohesion and Performance,” Small Group Behavior, “Are You Ready for Virtual Teams?” HR Magazine,
22 (1991): 175–86; Stanley M. Gully, Dennis 41 (September 1996): np; accessed via EBSCOhost
J. Devine, and David J. Whitney, “A Meta-Analysis on World Wide Web, August 2, 2002.
of Cohesion and Performance: Effects of Level of 79. Stefanie K. Johnson, Kenneth Bettenhausen, and
Analysis and Task Interdependence,” Small Group Ellie Gibbons, “Realities of Working in Virtual
Research, 26 (November 1995): 497–520. Teams: Affective and Attitudinal Outcomes of
gal37018_ch06_135_168.indd 167 3/28/18 12:36 PM