Page 182 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 182

Communication and Group Culture            165


                     NOTES

                       1.  This story is a modified version of a case found in   Developmental Breakpoints,” Communication
                        Marshall S. Poole, “Group Communication and the   Quarterly, 35 (Spring 1987): 105–24.
                        Structuring Process,” in Small Group       12.  Robert F. Bales, Interaction Process Analysis
                        Communication: A Reader, 7th ed., eds. Robert   (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1950).
                        S. Cathcart, Larry A. Samovar, and Linda    13.  Ernest G. Bormann, Discussion and Group Methods:
                        D. Henman (Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark,    Theory and Practice, 3rd ed. (New York: Harper &
                        1996): 89–91.                                 Row, 1990): 132–39.
                       2.  Bryan Seyfarth, “Structuration Theory in Small    14.  David B. Barker, “The Behavioral Analysis of
                        Group Communication: A Review and Agenda for   Interpersonal Intimacy in Group Development,”
                        Future Research,” in Communication Yearbook 23,   Small Group Research, 22 (February 1991): 76–91.
                        ed. Michael Roloff (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,    15.  Bormann, Discussion and Group Methods, 139.
                        2000): 341–79.                             16.  Bales, Interaction Process Analysis.
                       3.  Marshall S. Poole, David R. Siebold, and Robert    17.  J. I. Hurwitz, A. F. Zander, and B. Hymovitch,
                        D. McPhee, “Group Decision Making and the     “Some Effects of Power on the Relations among
                        Structurational Process,” Quarterly Journal of   Group Members,” in Group Dynamics: Research and
                        Speech, 71 (1985): 74–102; Marshall S. Poole,   Theory, 3rd ed., eds. D. Cartwright and A. Zander
                        David R. Seibold, and Robert D. McPhee, “A    (New York: Harper & Row, 1968): 291–97.
                        Structurational Approach to Theory-Building in    18.  Dean C. Barnlund and C. Harland, “Propinquity
                        Decision-Making Research,” in Communication and   and Prestige as Determinants of Communication
                        Group Decision Making, eds. Randy Y. Hirokawa   Networks,” Sociometry, 26 (1963): 467–79.
                        and Marshall S. Poole (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage,    19.  E. Hollander, “Conformity, Status, and Idiosyncrasy
                        1986): 237–64; and Poole, “Group Communication   Credit,” Psychological Review, 65 (1958): 117–27.
                        and the Structuring Process,” 85–95.       20.  Michelle Estrada, Justin Brown, and Fiona Lee,
                       4.  Poole, “Group Communication and the Structuring   “Who Gets the Credit? Perceptions of Idiosyncrasy
                        Process.”                                     Credit in Work Groups,” Small Group Research, 26
                       5.  Sunwolf and David R. Seibold, “Jurors’ Intuitive   (February 1995): 56–76.
                        Rules for Deliberation: A Structurational Approach    21.  Michele G. Alexander, Alexander W. Chizhik,
                        to Communication in Jury Decision Making,”    Estella W. Chizhik, and Jeffrey A. Goodman,
                        Communication Monographs, 65 (1998): 282–307.  “Lower-Status Participation and Influence: Task
                       6.  Seyfarth, “Structuration Theory in Small Group   Structure Matters,” Journal of Social Issues, 65 (2)
                        Communication.”                               (2009): 365–81.
                       7.  Craig Scott, “Communication Technology and    22.  Reef Youngreen and Christopher D. Moore, “The
                        Group Communication,” in The Handbook of Group   Effects of Status Violations on Hierarchy and
                        Communication Theory and Research, ed. Lawrence   Influence in Groups,” Small Group Research, 39
                        Frey (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999): 432–72.  (October 2008): 569–87.
                       8.  Scott A. Krebs, Elizabeth V. Hobman, and Prashant    23.  Craig R. Scott, “Communication Technology and
                        Bordia, “Virtual Teams and Group Member       Group Communication,” in Handbook of Group
                        Dissimilarity: Consequences for the Development   Communication Theory and Research, ed. Lawrence
                        of Trust,” Small Group Research, 37 (December   R. Frey (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999): 432–72.
                        2006): 721–41.                             24.  Carolyn J. Wood, “Challenging the Assumptions
                       9.  Seyfarth, “Structuration Theory in Small Group   Underlying the Use of Participatory Decision
                        Communication.”                               Making Strategies: A Longitudinal Case Study,”
                      10.  Poole, “Group Communication and the Structuring   Small Group Behavior, 20 (1989): 428–48.
                        Process.”                                  25.  Kimberly Barsamian Kahn, Manuela Barreto,
                      11.  B. Aubrey Fisher and Randall K. Stutman, “An   Cheryl R. Kaiser, and Marco Sliva Rego, “When Do
                        Assessment of Group Trajectories: Analyzing   High and Low Status Group Members Support









          gal37018_ch06_135_168.indd   165                                                              3/28/18   12:36 PM
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187