Page 61 - Electrical Safety of Low Voltage Systems
P. 61

44   Chapter Three


                                  where R i (t)isthe reliability function, which represents the number of devices
                                  that survived up to time t (100 in our case).  t equals 1 year. We solve for
                                  R i (1):
                                                          R i (1) = 99.48.
                                  Q. Is traveling on an airplane more hazardous than riding a motorcycle?
                                  A. The feared/expected damage to persons in case of failure of the airplane
                                  systems during a flight is very high, unlike the case of the motorcycle, whose
                                  failure will not necessarily cause a fatal outcome.
                                     On the other hand, because the technology employed on an airplane is
                                  much more sophisticated than the one used on motorcycles, the probability
                                  of an aircraft failure is lower. Ergo, the airplane may be considered safer than
                                  the motorcycle.

                                  Q. Would a piece of equipment in which, hypothetically, the basic insulation
                                  and the conductive enclosure have been inverted between each other be safer?
                                  A. Hypothetically speaking, Class I equipment with the basic insulation cov-
                                  ering the outside of the metal enclosure would not be safer! Eq. (3.10), in fact,
                                  does not take into account the mutual positions of the protective measures.
                                     However, the risk offered by this hypothetical piece of equipment would
                                  decrease, as the probability of touching the energized enclosure would greatly
                                  reduce.

                             Endnotes

                                  1. See Chap. 10.
                                  2. IEEE Std. 493-2007, “IEEE Recommended Practice for the Design of Reliable Industrial
                                    and Commercial Power Systems.”
                                  3. See Chap. 15 for further details.
                                  4. Nuclear facilities, aircraft, and spacecraft may be the exception. Such installa-
                                    tions typically use a radial distribution and the connecting wires are redundant
                                    (i.e., doubled).
                                  5. In installations, a component with the sole basic insulation (e.g., cables in air)
                                    may become Class 0 equipment due to deposit of conductive dust or moisture
                                    eventually present in the environment, which may act as a metal enclosure.
                                  6. We have already discussed in Chap. 2 that in supervised locations (e.g., noncon-
                                    ducting locations) Class 0 equipment can be used.
                                  7. Bonding/grounding connections mechanically link protective conductors to
                                    metal enclosures, ground rods, steel structures, the neutral point of the source,
                                    etc.
                                  8. The North American National Electrical Code states, instead, that double insulated
                                    pieces of equipment are not required to be bonded. Therefore, their bonding is
                                    permitted.
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66