Page 208 - Elements of Distribution Theory
P. 208

P1: JZP
            052184472Xc06  CUNY148/Severini  May 24, 2005  2:41





                            194                         Stochastic Processes

                              Consider
                                                           W t+h − W t
                                                                                                (6.9)
                                                               h
                            for small h;of course, the derivative of W t is simply the limit of this ratio as h → 0. Since
                                                                                                √
                            W t+h − W t has variance h, the difference W t+h − W t tends to be of the same order as  h;
                            for instance,
                                                                          1
                                                    E(|W t+h − W t |) = (2h/π) 2 .
                                                        1
                            Thus, (6.9) tends to be of order h  −  2 , which diverges as h → 0.
                              Let f :[0, ∞) → R denote a continuous function of bounded variation and consider the
                            quantity
                                                        n
                                                                               2
                                                Q n ( f ) =  [ f ( j/n) − f (( j − 1)/n)] .
                                                        j=1
                            This is a measure of the variation of f over the interval [0, 1]. Note that
                                                                     n

                                   Q n ( f ) ≤ max | f ( j/n) − f (( j − 1)/n)|  | f ( j/n) − f (( j − 1)/n)|.
                                           1≤ j≤n
                                                                     j=1
                            Since f is continuous on [0, ∞)itis uniformly continuous on [0, 1] and, hence,
                                                lim max | f ( j/n) − f (( j − 1)/n)|= 0.
                                               n→∞ 1≤ j≤n
                            Since f is of bounded variation,
                                                     n

                                                       | f ( j/n) − f (( j − 1)/n)|
                                                    j=1
                            is bounded in n. Hence, Q n ( f ) approaches 0 as n →∞.
                              Now consider Q n as applied to {W t : t ≥ 0}.By properties (W2) and (W3), W j/n −
                            W ( j−1)/n , j = 1,..., n, are independent, identically distributed random variables, each
                            with a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance 1/n. Hence, for all n = 1, 2,...,
                                                      n

                                                                       2
                                                  E     (W j/n − W ( j−1)/n) )  = 1;
                                                     j=1
                            that is, E[Q n (W t )] = 1 for all n = 1, 2,.... This suggests that the paths of a Wiener process
                            are of unbounded variation, which is in fact true; see, for example, Billingsley (1968,
                            Section 9).

                            The Wiener process as a martingale
                            Since, for any s > t, W s − W t and W t are independent, it follows that
                                            E[W s |W t ] = E[W s − W t |W t ] + E[W t |W t ] = W t ,

                            a property similar to that of martingales. In fact, a Wiener process is a (continuous time)
                            martingale; see, for example, Freedman (1971). Although a treatment of continuous time
                            martingales is beyond the scope of this book, it is not difficult to construct a discrete time
                            martingale from a Wiener process. Let {W t : t ≥ 0} denote a Wiener process and let 0 ≤
                            t 1 < t 2 < t 3 < ··· denote an increasing sequence in [0, ∞). For each n = 1, 2,..., define
   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213