Page 206 - Elements of Distribution Theory
P. 206

P1: JZP
            052184472Xc06  CUNY148/Severini  May 24, 2005  2:41





                            192                         Stochastic Processes

                            Hence, T 1 has an exponential distribution with rate parameter λ. More generally, the interar-
                            rival times T 1 , T 2 ,... are independent, identically distributed exponential random variables.
                            Conversely, if T 1 , T 2 ,... are known to be independent exponential random variables then
                            the counting process is a Poisson process. Thus, a counting process is a Poisson process if
                            and only if the interarrival times are independent exponential random variables.
                              A formal proof of this result is surprisingly difficult and will not be attempted here; see,
                            for example, Kingman (1993, Section 4.1). It is easy, however, to give an informal argument
                            showing why we expect the result to hold.
                              We have seen that T 1 has an exponential distribution. Now consider
                                         Pr(T 2 > t|T 1 = t 1 ) = Pr[N(t 1 + t) − N(t 1 ) = 0|T 1 = t 1 ].

                            Since a Poisson process has independent increments, we expect that
                               Pr[N(t 1 + t) − N(t 1 ) = 0|T 1 = t 1 ] = Pr[N(t 1 + t) − N(t 1 ) = 0] = exp(−λt).  (6.8)

                            Hence, T 1 and T 2 are independent and the marginal distribution of T 2 is an exponential
                            distribution with parameter λ. This approach may be carried out indefinitely:

                                        Pr(T m > t|T 1 = t 1 ,..., T m−1 = t m−1 )
                                          = Pr[N(t 1 +· · · + t m−1 + t) − N(t 1 + ··· + t m−1 ) = 0]
                                          = exp{−λt}.
                            The difficulty in carrying out this argument rigorously is in showing that (6.8) actually
                            follows from (PP2). For instance, the event that T 1 = t 1 is the event that N(t) jumps from
                            0to1at t = t 1 and, hence, it is not a straightforward function of differences of the form
                            N(t j ) − N(t j−1 ) for some set of t j .



                                                      6.6 Wiener Processes

                            A Wiener process or Brownian motion is a continuous time process {W t : t ≥ 0} with the
                            following properties:

                              (W1) Pr(W 0 = 0) = 1
                              (W2) The process has independent increments:if

                                                          0 ≤ t 0 ≤ t 1 ≤· · · ≤ t m ,
                                   then the random variables
                                                    W t 1  − W t 0  , W t 2  − W t 1  ,..., W t m  − W t m−1
                                   are independent.
                                                         has a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance
                              (W3)For t 2 > t 1 ≥ 0, W t 2  − W t 1
                                   t 2 − t 1 .
                              Processes satisfying (W1)–(W3) can always be defined in such a way so as to be con-
                            tinuous; hence, we assume that (W4) is satisfied as well:
                              (W4)For every realization of the process, W t is a continuous function of t.

                              Two basic properties of Wiener processes are given in the following theorem.
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211