Page 179 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Chemical Engineering
P. 179

P1: GGY Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN004D-156  June 8, 2001  15:28






               22                                                                             Cryogenic Process Engineering


                               TABLE II Comparison of Several Liquefaction Systems Using Air as the Working
                               Fluid a
                                                             Liquid yield  Work per unit mass  Figure
                                    Air liquefaction system b  (y = ˙ m f / ˙ m)  liquefied, (kJ/kg)  of merit
                               Ideal reversible system         1.000          715          1.000
                               Simple Linde system, p 2 = 20 MPa,  0.086      5240         0.137
                                η c = 100%, ε = 1.0
                               Simple Linde system, p 2 = 20 MPa,  0.061      10620        0.068
                                η c = 70%, ε = 0.95
                               Simple Linde system observed     —             10320        0.070
                               Precooled simple Linde system,  0.179          2240         0.320
                                 p 2 = 20 MPa, T 3 = 228 K,
                                η c = 100%, ε = 1.00
                               Precooled simple Linde system,  0.158          3700         0.194
                                 p 2 = 20 MPa, T 3 = 228 K,
                                η c = 70%, ε = 0.95
                               Precooled simple Linde system, observed  —     5580         0.129
                               Linde dual-pressure system,     0.060          2745         0.261
                                 p 3 = 20 MPa, p 2 = 6MPa,
                                i = 0.8, η c = 100%, ε = 1.00
                               Linde dual-pressure system,     0.032          8000         0.090
                                 p 3 = 20 MPa, P 2 = 6MPa,
                                i = 0.8, η c = 70%, ε = 0.95
                               Linde dual-pressure system, observed  —        6340         0.113
                               Linde dual-pressure system,      —             3580         0.201
                                precooled to 228 K, observed
                               Claude system, p 2 = 4 MPa,     0.260          890          0.808
                                x = ˙ m e / ˙ m = 0.7 η c = η e = 100%,
                                ε = 1.00
                               Claude system, p 2 = 4 MPa,     0.189          2020         0.356
                                x = ˙ m e / ˙ m = 0.7, η c = 70%,
                                η e,ad = 80%, η e,m = 90%, ε = 0.95
                               Claude system, observed          —             3580         0.201
                               Cascade system, observed         —             3255         0.221
                                 a  Inlet conditions of 294.4 K and 0.1 MPa.
                                 b  η c denotes compressor overall efficiency; η c expander overall efficiency; η e,ad expander adiabatic
                               efficiency; η e,m expander mechanical efficiency; and ε heat exchanger effectiveness. i = m 1 /m is mass
                               in intermediate stream divided by mass through compressor, and x = m e /m is mass through expander
                               divided by mass through compressor.


               liquefaction cycle considered earlier but with a rectifica-  This problem was solved by the introduction of the
               tion column substituted for the liquid reservoir. (Since it is  Linde double-column system. Two rectification columns
               immaterial how the liquid is to be furnished to the column,  are placed one on top of the other (hence the name
               any of the other liquefaction cycles could have been used  double-column system). In this system, liquid air is in-
               in place of the simple Linde cycle.)              troduced at an intermediate point in the lower column. A
                 Although the oxygen product purity is high from a sim-  condenser–evaporator at the top of the lower column pro-
               ple single-column separation scheme, the nitrogen effluent  vides the reflux needed for the rectification process to ob-
               stream always contains about 6 to 7% oxygen. In other  tain essentially pure nitrogen at this point. In order for
               words, approximately one-third of the oxygen liquefied  the column to also deliver pure oxygen, the oxygen-rich
               as feed to the column is lost in the nitrogen stream. This  liquid (∼45% oxygen), from the boiler in the lower col-
               inherent loss of a valuable product in the single-column  umn is introduced at an intermediate level in the upper
               operation is not only undesirable but highly wasteful in  column. The reflux and the rectification process in the
               terms of compression requirements.                upper column produce pure oxygen at the bottom and
   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184