Page 289 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd InOrganic Chemistry
P. 289

P1: GNH Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN009M-428  July 18, 2001  1:6






               546                                                                       Metal Particles and Cluster Compounds


                                                                 teins, and many synthesized model complexes do not pos-
                                                                 sess extensive metal-metal bonding. The lack of M M
                                                                 bonding in these clusters may be due to the low Fe:S ra-
                                                                 tios. The abundance of sulfide ligands makes these clusters
                                                                 electron rich. Perhaps population of M M antibonding
                                                                 orbitals is the result.
                                                                   Our brief look at atomic donor ligands will conclude
                                                                 with the halogens. The reluctance of a halogen to share
                                                                 all seven of its valence electrons with a cluster is made
                                                                 evident by the rarity of cluster compounds which contain
                                                                 an interstitially bound halogen. As a surface ligand halo-
                                                                 gens may be terminally bound to a metal atom, in which
                                                                 case it is serving as a one-electron donor, or they may act
                                                                 as three-electron donors by adopting a bridging mode of
                                                                 coordination. Both µ 2 - and µ 3 -bridges are common.
                                                                   This group of atomic donor ligands is unique in that they
                                                                 stabilize a host of binary cluster compounds. In fact, the
                                                                 first compounds recognized to have a cluster framework
                                                                 were octahedral metal chlorides. Two common forms of
                                                                 octahedral metal halide clusters exist (Fig. 39). One type
                                                                 is seen in [(Ta 6 (µ 2 -Cl) 12 ))Cl 6 ] 4−  where all twelve edges
                                                                 of the tantalum octahedron are bridged by chlorine atoms.
                                                                 The other six chlorine atoms are terminally bound, one to
                                                                 each Ta vertex, and may be removed to produce the di-
               FIGURE  37  Structure  of  (a)  [Rh 10 (µ 8 -S)(CO) 22 ] 2−  and  (b)
                                                                 cation [Ta 6 (Cl 12 )] . [(Mo 6 (µ 3 -Cl) 8 )Cl 6 ] 2−  exhibits the
                                                                                2+
               [Rh 17 (µ 9 -S) 2 (CO) 32 ] 3− . The Rh 10  cluster is a bicapped square
               antiprism. A sulfido ligand occupies the square antiprism cavity.  second common structural form where all eight faces of
               The Rh 17  cluster contains three square antiprisms. The cavity of  the octahedron are capped by triply bridging chlorides.
               the center one is occupied by an Rh atom. The two outer square  The six-terminal chlorides in this cluster may also be
               antiprisms each encapsulate a one sulfur atom. (Terminal CO are
               not shown.)                                       removed.
                                                                   A precursor of the prevalent [(M 6 (µ 3 -X 8 )X 6 ] 2−  core is
                                                                                              2−
                                                                 seen in [(Mo 5 (µ 3 -Cl) 4 (µ 2 -Cl) 4 Cl 5 ] . This is related to
                 One  such  model  recently  synthesized  is  [Fe 8 S 6 I 8 ] 3−  [(Mo 6 (µ 3 -Cl) 8 )Cl 6 ] 2−  by the removal of a Mo–Cl vertex
               (Fig. 38). This cluster is unique in that the Fe 8  core forms  (this is a conceptual relationship and not one achieved
               an  almost  perfect  cube.  The  six  faces  of  the  cube  are  chemically). The nido Mo 5 cluster contains four (µ 2 -Cl)
               capped  by  (µ 4 -S)  ligands  and  each  Fe  vertex  has  one  ligands which would be µ 3 -chlorides if the sixth vertex of
               terminal iodide ligand. Although the Fe Fe distances of  the octahedron were in place.
                        ˚
               2.71–2.73 A in this cluster supports the presence of metal–  The bulk of binary metal–halide clusters involve the
               metal bonding many of the naturally occurring Fe–S pro-  early transition metals, however, later transition metal–
                                                                 halide clusters are known. [Pt 6 (µ 2 -Cl) 12 ] is one example.

















               FIGURE 38  Structure of Fe 8 S 6 I 8 . Each square face of the Fe 8
               cube is capped by a sulfur atom. (One terminal I per Fe is not  FIGURE 39 Two common cores for octahedral metal halide clus-
               shown.)                                           ters of the general formulas (a) [M 6 X 12 ] 2+  and (b) [M 6 X 8 ] 4+ .
   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294