Page 178 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 178

160               Engineered interfaces in fiber reinforced composites

                                1
                       8m(a,z) = -{2aokvfo   - yo( 1 - 2kv,)[l  - exp(-h)](~ - o)} .   (4.147)
                               Em
                   Hence, for the fiber pull-out, the residual strains after complete unloading when the
                   external stress is zero now become:
                                  1
                       &(a,z)   = --o(l   - 2kvf)[l - exp(-h)]a  ,                  (4.148)
                                  Ef
                                     1
                                                                .
                       8m-res(~,~) - 2kv,)[l  - exp(-h)]~                           (4.149)
                                  --yyo(l
                                =
                                    Em
                   Consequently,  the  residual  relative  displacement  in  fiber  pull-out  is  obtained  by
                   combining Eqs. (4.141), (4.148) and (4.149):
                            1                         1 - exp(-Ae)  loo .
                                                                   -
                       6,  = OlEf [a + y  - 2k(avf + yvm)]                          (4.150)
                     Similarly, the expressions for 6 and 6, for the fiber push-out  are derived as:

                                                        1
                                    [E"~(u,z)  - E~,(u,z)]~z = -(1  - 2vfk)b
                                                        Ef
                                  0
                                     1
                                  - - + y - 2k(avf + yv,,,)]
                                       [M
                                    MEf



                   Eqs.  (4.140)  and (4.150)-(4.152)  are used  to evaluate  the  response  of  the model
                   composites in cyclic loading and the displacements 6 and 6,  can be expressed as a
                   function of the alternating stress, Ao, and the number of cycles, N. In experiments,
                   degradation  of  the  interface  properties,  e.g.,  the  coefficient  of  friction,  p or
                   A(=  2@/u),  can also be expressed in terms of the cyclic loading parameters, Au and
                   N. In practice 6 and 6, can be measured using optical methods (with a microscope)
                   or  by  means  of  more  complicated  instruments  (see  for example  Naaman  et  al.
                   (1992)) in fiber pull-out. Alternatively, they can be directly determined from the load
                   and load-point  displacement records in the case of  fiber push-out.
                     It is envisaged that the degradation  of the frictional interface properties and the
                   corresponding increase in the relative displacements eventually lead to debond crack
                   growth  once the debond  criterion  is  satisfied. The debond  criterion based  on  the
                   energy balance theory given by Eq. (4.35) under monotonic loading can be rewritten as

                       G = G(~o,ct;,e) 2 Gic  >                                     (4.153)

                   where pois the original value of the coefficient of friction before degradation and o:
                   represents the applied fiber stress corresponding to debond length, e.  Under cyclic
                   loading the debond criterion becomes
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183