Page 175 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 175

Chapter 4.  Micromechanics of  stress transfer   157
                                    I
                                 80















                                   0-
                                    0  0.1  0.2  0.3  0.4  0.5  0.6
                                                   L-z (mm)
                Fig. 4.40. Distributions of interface shear stress, q, along the fiber length at a constant applied stress
                u = 4.0GPa  for  carbon  fiber-epoxy  matrix  composites  in  fiber  pull-out  and  fibcr  push-out. After
                                             Kim et al. (1994~).
                gradually through wearing out or smoothing of the fiber surface roughness due to
                abrasions  under repeated  loading and unloading.  Experimental  evidence on some
                ceramic matrix composites containing SCS-6 Sic fibers (Jero and Keran, 1990; Jero
                et  al.,  1991; Carter  et  al.,  1991; Waren  et  al.,  1992; Mackin  et  al.,  1992a) and
                sapphire  fibers  (Mackin  et  al.,  1992b) has  shown  that  the  roughness  interaction
                contributes significantly to the interfacial clamping stress, as mentioned  in Section
                4.3.1. Frictional  resistance is reduced  when  a fiber predisplaced  in  pull-out (or in
                push-out), is then forced back to its original position, due probably to the fiber re-
                seating in the matrix socket where the fiber surface roughness matches that of the
                matrix.. Mode  I  fatigue  tests  on  a  meta-stable  p-titanium  alloy  reinforced  with
                unidirectional  SCS-6  Sic fibers  also  strongly  indicate  that  degradation  of  the
                interface properties allows large debonding and sliding.
                  Fatigue tests can be conducted on the same single fiber-matrix  cylinder model as
                used  for monotonic  pull-out  and push-out  tests.  A  simple alternating  tensile (or
                compressive)  stress  of  magnitude  Ao (= omax - omin where  omin = 0)  is  applied
                repeatedly  to the fiber for each loading geometry,  as schematically shown in Fig.
                4.41. It is  assumed here  that the smoothed fiber surface due to repeated  abrasion
                eventually leads to a reduction in the frictional shear stress at the interface, which is
                cquivalcnt  to  a  dccrcasc in  the  cocfficicnt of  friction  p. Bascd  on  the  thcorctical
                results,  a  simple  experimental  method  is  proposed  to  evaluate  the  frictional
                degradation  of the interface.

                4.5.2. Relative displacements and degradation function

                  Degradation  of  frictional  resistance  at  the  debonded  interface  will  cause  the
                relative axial displacement between fiber and matrix to increase gradually. There are
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180