Page 362 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 362

Chapter 8.  Improvement of  interlaminar fracture toughness with interface control   343

               tension.  The  testing  technique  to  measure  the  free  edge  interlaminar  fracture
               toughness using mode 1 edge delamination test (EDT, see Fig. 3.34) is schematicaily
               shown in  Section 3.4.4.  Free edge delamination  is a  direct  manifestation of  large
               interlaminar  stresses which are highly localized near  the free edges.  Fig.  8.13 (a)
               illustrates  the stress concentrations,  in particular  for the tensile stress component
               through  the  laminate  thickness,  taking  place  near  the  free  edge.  The  free  edge
               stresses arise  from  the  mismatch  in  the  laminar  coefficient of  thermal  expansion
               (CTE) and Poisson ratio between the adjoining layers (Herakovich, 1981). If there is
               no mismatch of these parameters, the interlaminar stresses do not exist even if there
               is a mismatch in elastic and shear moduli. Even so, delamination between layers of
               the same orientation can take place if there is an interface moment arising from the
               neighboring  plies  of  different  orientations  or  elastic  properties.  For  example,
               delamination at the free edge of a laminate [ f 45°/00/900], may occur in the mid-
               plane, that is at the interface [9O0/9Oo], laminae where a large interface moment and
               tensile stress in the through-thickness direction exist.
                 The  magnitude  and  distribution  of  the  interlaminar  stress  components  vary
               widely and depend upon the number of plies for each angle, ply thickness, stacking
               sequence, the properties  of the composite constituents  and the nature  of loading
               (Kim,  1989). The  lay  up  sequence,  in  particular,  has  a  significant effect  on  the
               magnitude and the direction  of the interlaminar stresses (Pipes and Pagano,  1970;
               Pagano  and  Pipes,  1973;  Daniel  et  al.,  1974;  Wang  and  Crossman,  1977;
               Herakovich,  1981,  1982; Wang  and  Choi,  1982; Kim  and  Soni,  1984; O'Brien,
                1983, 1984; Heyliger and Reddy,  1985; Joo and Sun,  1992; Kim and Hong,  1992;
               Xu, 1996). For example, the [90°/450/00/-450], laminate is less prone to delamination
               than  the  [ * 45"/0"/90°],  laminate  because  the  through-thickness  normal  stresses
               generated at the mid-plane are compressive and tensile, respectively, for the former


                              5


















               Fig. 8.13. (a) Distribution of interlaminar normal stress, I?=, and interlaminar shear stress, rz.,.,  in [OO/W"]s
               laminate  under axial tension. (b) Effect of stacking sequence on through-the-thickness distribution  of
               interlaminar normal stress, cZ. near free edge: stacking sequence: (-   ) [ f I5"/ f 45"],; (-   ) [ 15'/45'/-
                             45"/-15"],:  (...---.) [*45"/*  IS'],.  After Pagano and Pipes (1973)
   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367