Page 44 - Entrophy Analysis in Thermal Engineering Systems
P. 44

Teaching entropy                                              35


              where p o denotes the atmospheric pressure, V o the volume at p o and freezing
              temperature, E the expansion coefficient, t the temperature measured in
              degree centigrade, p and V represent the pressure and the volume of the
              gas at temperature t.
                                1
                 Substituting T o ¼ into Eq. (3.7) gives
                                E
                                        pV ¼  p o V o  T                  (3.8)
                                              T o
              where T o ¼273 corresponds to the coefficient of thermal expansion of air
              and T¼273+t.
                 Eq. (3.8) is the simplest state equation that is referred to as the ideal
              gas equation, which is used in the analytical arguments of Carnot [1],
              Clapeyron [6], Thomson [7], Rankine [8], and Clausius [9]. The numerical
              constant T o employed in the analyses of Carnot and Clapeyron was 267,
              whereas it was 274.6 (inverse of the expansion coefficient of gases at the
              temperature of melting ice) in Rankine’s work. Rankine also noted the
              absolute temperature of melting ice being 494.3 degrees in Fahrenheit scale.

              3.2.4 Clausius inequality
              The last step in the traditional method of teaching entropy is the presentation
              of the Clausius inequality given in Eq. (3.9), which then leads to the intro-
              duction of entropy as defined in Eq. (1.9). However, the Clausius inequality
              is usually introduced without sufficient background and without a clear con-
              nection to the previous steps. One would then need to figure out how to
              connect the dots, i.e., Carnot cycle, absolute temperature, reversibility,
              Clausius inequality, and entropy.

                                          þ
                                           δQ
                                                 0                        (3.9)
                                            T
              In summary, the traditional method of introducing entropy as a thermody-
              namic property requires one to go through a lengthy and twisted process as
              schematically depicted in Fig. 3.3. The three intermediate steps in Fig. 3.3
              are not fully justifiable as discussed in the previous sections. Furthermore, an
              introduction of the Clausius inequality as an analytical expression of the sec-
              ond law without a background is inappropriate. Among recent authors,
              Bejan [3] provides an analysis to derive the Clausius inequality. In the next
              section, a simple and straightforward approach is presented for introducing
              entropy in thermodynamics classes.
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49