Page 112 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 112

Failure Analysis Case Studies II
          D.RH. Jones (Editor)
          0 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.  All rights reserved                                       97








                 Catastrophic failure of a polypropylene tank Part XI:

          comparison of the DVS 2205 code of practice and the design of
                                             the failed tank


                                      G.W. Weidmann*, P.R. Lewis
            Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty  of Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, U.K.

                                  Received 19 October 1998; accepted 4 November 1998


          Abstract

            The design of a failed, large (20 m3) polypropylene storage tank is compared with the recommendations
          of the German Code of Practice, DVS 2205, to which it allegedly conformed. It is shown that the tank was
          seriously under-designed, and that the situation was  exacerbated by  the introduction of  residual tensile
          stresses in its walls during its manufacture. 0 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

          Keywords: Code of practice; Design; Failure; Polypropylene; Standard; Tank; Weld




          1.  Introduction

            The  problem  of  designing load-bearing  structures  in  plastics  differs from  that  of  designing
          comparable structures in metals such as steels in several important ways, particularly if the design
          life of the structure is intended to be a long one (20 or 30 years, say). These differences arise because
          the behaviour of plastics under load is not only time-dependent but also non-linear, because their
          range of recoverable strains is typically some ten times larger than in metals, because plastics can
          often be more sensitive to stress concentrations than metals, and because plastics react in a different
          way  to environmental agents than metals.  Failure to appreciate these differences has led  (and
          unfortunately  still does lead) to premature failure of plastics products, and to their acquiring an
          early reputation for being ‘cheap and nasty’.
            The basis of much rational design with plastics is the so-called ‘pseudo-elastic design method’
          proposed  initially by  Baer et al. [l]. In this,  the appropriate  time- and temperature-dependent
          values of modulus and Poisson’s ratio are substituted for the elastic ones in the standard stress-
          strain solutions for a given loading configuration and part geometry. Initially, before sufficiently



            * Corresponding author. Tel.: 01908-653271; fax: 01908-653858.
          Reprinted from Engineering Failure Analysis 6 (4),  215-232 (1999)
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117