Page 116 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 116

101



















                                      Fig. 2. Tank with graded wall thickness.




        (iii)  for containers with vertical welds, the increase in wall thickness has already been taken into
            account in the joint factor,f,, so that




           The largest value of wall thickness obtained from eqns 2(a)-(c)  is the definitive value to be
           used.



        3.  Application to the failed tank

        3.1, Equation for the wall thickness of the failed tank
          The failed tank had four abrupt and large changes in wall thickness (a factor of two) between
        its base and its top (see Fig. 1). Taken together with the constraining effect of the base, this suggests
        that a value of C = 1.82 should be used in eqns 2(a) and (b) to calculate the wall thickness. Then,
        with

              d = 2700mm = 2.7m
              p  = 1540 kgm-3

              g  = 9.81 m s-2
            ozul = 2.54Nmm-’  = 2.54~ 106Nm-*

        The equation for s becomes
                       2.7 x 1540 x 9.81 x h
            S=  1.82~
                          2 x 2.54 x  106
              = 1.46~ 10-2h                                                                    (3)
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121