Page 184 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 184

Failure Analysis Case Studies 11
         D.R.H. Jones (Editor)
         0 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.  All rights reserved                                      169








                   Premature fracture of a composite nylon radiator


                                                P.R. Lewis*
                  Department  of Muteriab Engineering, Faculty of  Technology, The Open University, Walton Hull,
                                           Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, U.K.

                                  Received 30 August 1998; accepted 8 September 1998


         Abstract

           Fracture of a GF nylon composite radiator occurred in a new car, leading to seizure of the engine. The
         fracture probably started at a cold slug or void present on an unusually large weld line in the radiator, itself
         probably created by  poor moulding conditions. Rather than being a design fault, the failure was probably
         caused by lack of quality control during injection moulding. 0 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

          Keywords: Radiator; Nylon; Composite; Void; Weld line; Fracture






          1.  Introduction

            A new design of radiator tank failed on a new car during test driving. The tank was constructed
         from glass-filled (GF) nylon, a composite material used in engine compartments for its temperature
         resistance and strength. Many inlet manifolds, such as that on the new Jaguar XK8 for example,
         are now made from GF nylon 6,6 using the lost-metal injection moulding process [ 11.
            The car had only travelled about 500 miles before catastrophic failure of the cooling system,
         which led to seizure of the engine. Some 200 similar prototype tanks had been produced and fitted
         to  similar  cars,  and  the  manufacturer  was  concerned  that  there  might  be  a  design  problem.
         Although  they had considerable experience with the material in other radiators, the bodies were
         moulded by a sub-contractor elsewhere.
            They therefore wished to know how the crack had been formed in the radiator, and whether the
         problem was due to faulty material, poor design or manufacture, or a combination of such causes.
         A programme of microscopy was undertaken to examine the fracture surface and other features
         of the moulded tank. A new, unused tank was used for comparison. Mechanical testing was also
         used to examine the quality of the material.



           *Tel.: 01908 653278: Fax: 01908 653858

         Reprinted from Engineering Failure Analysis 6 (3), 1 8 1 - 195 (1 999)
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189