Page 117 - Fair, Geyer, and Okun's Water and wastewater engineering : water supply and wastewater removal
P. 117

JWCL344_ch03_061-117.qxd  8/17/10  7:48 PM  Page 80







                    80  Chapter 3  Water Sources: Groundwater
                                         continued at the rate of pumping and a recharge well with the same flow had been superim-
                                         posed on the discharge well at the instance the discharge was shut down. The residual draw-
                                         down, s , can be found from Eq. 3.15 as follows:
                                                                 s   (114.6Q>T)[W(u)   W(u )]                (3.25)
                                          where
                                                                              2
                                                                      u   1.87r S>4Tt
                                                                              2
                                                                     u   1.87r S>(4Tt )
                                          where r is the effective radius of the well (or the distance to the observation well), t is the
                                          time since pumping started, and t  is the time since pumping stopped. For small values of r
                                          and large values of t, the residual drawdown may be obtained from Eq. 3.19:
                                                       s   (264Q>T) log (t>t )   (U.S. Customary Units)     (3.26a)

                                          Solving for T,
                                                        T   (264Q>s ) log(t>t )  (U.S. Customary Units)     (3.27a)
                                             Plotting s  on an arithmetic scale and t>t  on a logarithmic scale, a straight line is
                                          drawn through the observations. The coefficient of transmissivity can be determined from
                                          the slope of the line, or for convenience, the change of residual drawdown over one log
                                          cycle can be used as:
                                                           T   264Q> s       (U.S. Customary Units)         (3.28a)

                                          where the U.S. customary units are : s  (ft), Q (gpm), T (gpd/ft), t (min), t  (min) and  s
                                                                                              3
                                                                                                     3
                                          (ft). The comparable equations using the SI units of s  (m), Q (m /d), T (m /d/m), t (min),
                                         t  (min) and  s  (m) are:
                                                             s¿= (0.1833Q>T) log (t>t¿)  (SI Units)         (3.26b)
                                                              T = (0.1833Q>s¿) log (t>t¿)  (SI Units)       (3.27b)
                                                              T = 0.1833Q>¢s¿)          (SI Units)          (3.28b)
                                             Strictly speaking, the Theis equation and its approximations are applicable only to sit-
                                         uations that satisfy the assumptions used in their derivation. They undoubtedly also pro-
                                         vide reasonable approximations in a much wider variety of conditions than their restrictive
                                         assumptions would suggest. Significant departures from the theoretical model will be re-
                                         flected in the deviation of the test data from the type curves. Advances have recently been
                                         made in obtaining analytical solutions for anisotropic aquifers, for aquifers of variable
                                         thickness, and for partially penetrating wells.


                    3.10.4 Unconfined Aquifers

                                         The partial differential equation governing nonsteady unconfined flow is nonlinear in h. In
                                         many cases, it is difficult or impossible to obtain analytical solutions to the problems of
                                         unsteady unconfined flow. A strategy commonly used is to investigate the conditions under
                                         which a confined flow equation would provide a reasonable approximation for the head
                                         distribution in an unconfined aquifer. These conditions are that (a) the drawdown at any
                                         point in the aquifer must be small relative to the total saturated thickness of the aquifer, and
                                         (b) the vertical head gradients must be negligible. This implies that the downward move-
                                         ment of the water table should be very slow, that is, that sufficient time must elapse for the
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122