Page 250 - Fiber Fracture
P. 250

234                                                            H.U. Kiinzi

               (Megusar  et  al.,  1979). More  recently, Flores  and  Dauskardt  (1999)  measured  this
               temperature rise by infrared imaging techniques in a Zr-Ti-Ni-Cu-Be   bulk amorphous
               alloy and observed a maximum temperature increase relative to ambient of 22.5"C at the
               crack tip. This is somewhat smaller, but still of the same magnitude as the prediction of
               about 55°C by their theoretical models. Alternatively, it was suggested (Spaepen, 1975,
               1977; Steif et al., 1982) that the intense shearing and the negative hydrostatic pressure
               produces a dilation of the structure (by production of  free volume) which also would
               decrease the viscosity in the shear bands. Pampillo (1975) and Davies (1978) point out
               that after the appearance of  a strong shear offset, giving rise to the smooth part of  the
               fracture surface, cracks nucleate at different weak  spots and propagate. In  fact there
               are many examples where tributary veins, starting from a larger ring-shaped vein, point
               to spots where cracks probably initiated (see right side of  fracture surface Fig. 47a).
               Veins are then formed by internal necking along lines where two crack fronts meet. The
               observation of small slip bands along the length of  veins in the STM by Kulawansa et
               al. (1993) provides direct evidence for this deformation.
                 However, in order to explain the occurrence of  veins that point towards a center the
               crack has to assume rather quickly a star-like form with spikes that move outwards. In
               fact Li (1978) proposed arguments that can explain the observed vein structures. In his
               picture, slip in metallic glasses arises from the displacement of generalized dislocations
               (see also Gilman,  1972; Pampillo,  1975; Davies,  1978). Fig. 48a  shows several slip
               offsets that terminate on  the surface. The line pointing to the interior that  starts from
               such a terminal point and separates the slipped from the unslipped area is by definition a
               dislocation. Such a line is of course not a dislocation in the usual sense. In an amorphous
               structure there is no constant Burgers vector and also the amount of slip may vary on the
               slipped area. But these are clearly only points of  secondary importance. A dislocation
               can equally well be characterized by its stress field and, as metallic glasses are perfectly
               elastic solids, there is no reason why a stress field similar to a dislocation in a crystalline
               lattice should not exist in an amorphous solid. According to Li this dislocation moves
               by  slip nucleation ahead and  behind  of  it. The  shear  stress there,  which  determines




















               Fig. 48. (a) Shear bands on the wide ribbon surface branching out from the fracture surface. Same ribbon as
               in Fig. 47a. (b) Irregular fracture surface that started from an edge defect. The initial structure less slip mark
               along the band width is missing. Same ribbon as in Fig. 47b.
   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255