Page 25 - Subyek Teknik Mesin - Forsthoffers Best Practice Handbook for Rotating Machinery by William E Forsthoffer
P. 25

List of Lessons Learned
        8.3: Using cartridge seal assemblies has resulted in  Chapter 10 The Post Shipment Phase
             significantly higher seal MTBFs.
        8.4: All cartridge seals should be statically pressure tested  Installation, Pre-Commissioning,
             prior to installation.                         Commissioning and Start-up Lessons
        8.5: Use of un-pressurized dual seals has exposed plant and  Learned
             personnel to potential losses.
        8.6: Failure to monitor seal chamber pressure has caused  10.1: Plant life safety and reliability is directly connected to
             low mechanical seal MTBFs.                           the project construction phase.
        8.7: Checks all seal system components every time the seal  10.2: Delayed machinery start-ups are often caused by
             is replaced to optimize MTBF.                        insufficient preservation programs.
        8.8: Low seal MTBFs have been caused by incompatible  10.3: Vendor site visits are not effective unless detailed site
             external flushes.                                     details are sent in advance.
        8.9: Use external flushes instead of flush line strainers and  10.4: Installing machinery without a proven foundation
             cyclone separators.                                  procedure will reduce MTBF.
       8.10: Failure to monitor the operation of seal quench systems  10.5: Failure to use epoxy grout for all machinery
             has caused low seal MTBFs.                           installations will reduce MTBFs.
       8.11: Failure to monitor performance is the major contributor  10.6: Improper process piping attachment will significantly
             to pump component failure.                           reduce machine MTBFs.
       8.12: Process fluid will leak from dual un-pressurized seal  10.7: Most oil flush procedures take too long and are not
             systems if the vent line is closed.                  effective.
       8.13: Lack of a mechanical seal installation procedure has  10.8: Failure to check operation of auxiliary systems prior to
             caused low seal MTBFs.                               start results in start-up delays.
                                                             10.9: Failure to perform an inert gas run exposes the plant to
                                                                  reduced safety and reliability.
                                                            10.10: Not performing commissioning driver solo runs
       Chapter 9 Dry Gas Seal Lessons                             exposes the plant to revenue losses.
       Learned                                              10.11: Failure to obtain detailed component baseline
                                                                  conditions reduces unit reliability.
        9.1: Failure to consider plant operating conditions has  10.12: Lack of operator machinery awareness will reduce
             resulted in low dry gas seal MTBFs.                  machinery safety and reliability.
        9.2: Double dry gas seal systems have fewer components  10.13: Lack of an effective site predictive maintenance
             than tandem seal systems.                            (PDM) program reduces MTBF.
        9.3: Failure to monitor secondary seals has exposed plant
             and personnel to safety issues.
        9.4: Labyrinth separation seal nitrogen consumption is too
             great to justify their usage.                  Chapter 11 Preventive and Predictive
        9.5: The use of ‘bone dry’ N 2 (dew points below e30 C) has  Maintenance Lessons Learned

             resulted in low seal MTBFs.
        9.6: Seal gas conditioning does not ensure reliability in  11.1: PM (time based) programs do not increase machinery
             saturated process gas applications.                  reliability and are costly.
        9.7: Many failures occur where the flare header can exceed  11.2: Short pump unit bearing bracket oil change intervals
             the seal gas supply pressure.                        (13e26) weeks reduce MTBFs.
        9.8: Dry gas seal separation systems do not prevent  11.3: Lack of a pump changeover program results in
             carryover of oil into the seal chamber.              significantly lower MTBFs.
        9.9: Failure to include a seal gas conditioning unit has  11.4: Control valve replacement during plant operation
             resulted in low seal reliability.                    exposes the plant to shutdowns.
       9.10: Tandem seals with a seal chamber pressure above 0.5  11.5: Yearly oil lubricated coupling PMs expose the plant to
             barg have higher MTBFs.                              unnecessary shutdowns.
       9.11: A primary orifice bypass device in high suction pressure  11.6: Oil system transient tests performed during
             services increases reliability.                      a turnaround are not accurate.
       9.12: Tripping on high primary vent conditions only can cause  11.7: Failure to trend machinery operating points reduces
             excessive plant shutdowns.                           machinery safety and reliability.
       9.13: Never connect bearing housing vents if dry gas seals are  11.8: PM-heavy maintenance programs produce lower
             used in the compressor.                              machinery MTBFs.
       9.14: Not using a delta pressure controller for the separation  11.9: Reliability groups not using operations and process
             seal has caused gas releases.                        input produce lower MTBFs.
       9.15: Lack of personnel awareness of DGS system function  11.10: Operations and process groups need increased
             reduces seal MTBFs.                                  machinery functional awareness.



           xxiv
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30