Page 52 - Foundations of Cognitive Psychology : Core Readings

50 Daniel C. Dennett

A:‘‘It turns out, to my amazement, that something can think without
having had the benefit of eyes, ears, hands, and a history.’’
B:‘‘It turns out, to my amazement, that something can pass the Turing
test without thinking.’’
Choosing between these ways of expressing my astonishment would be asking
myself a question ‘‘too meaningless to deserve discussion.’’

Discussion
Q: Why was Turing interested in differentiating a man from a woman in his famous
test?
A:That was just an example. He described a parlor game in which a man
would try to fool the judge by answering questions as a woman would answer.
I suppose that Turing was playing on the idea that maybe, just maybe, there is
a big difference between the way men think and the way women think. But of
course they’reboththinkers. He wanted to usethatfacttomakeusrealizethat,
even if there were clear differences between the way a computer and a person
thought, they’d both still be thinking.
Q: Why does it seem that some people are upset by AI research? Does AI research
threaten our self-esteem?
A:I think Herb Simon has already given the canniest diagnosis of that. For
many people the mind is the last refuge of mystery against the encroaching
spread of science, and they don’t like the idea of science engulfing the last bit of
terra incognita. This means that they are threatened, I think irrationally, by the
prospect that researchers in Artificial Intelligence may come to understand the
human mind as well as biologists understand the genetic code, or as well as
physicists understand electricity and magnetism. This could lead to the ‘‘evil
scientist’’ (to take a stock character from science fiction) who can control you
because he or she has a deep understanding of what’s going on in your mind.
This seems to me to be a totally valueless fear, one that you can set aside, for
the simple reason that the human mind is full of an extraordinary amount of
detailed knowledge, as, for example, Roger Schank has been pointing out.
As long as the scientist who is attempting to manipulate you does not
share all your knowledge, his or her chances of manipulating you are minimal.
People can always hit you over the head. They can do that now. We don’t
need Artificial Intelligence to manipulate people by putting them in chains or
torturing them. But if someone tries to manipulate you by controlling your
thoughts and ideas, that person will have to know what you know and more.
The best way to keep yourself safe from that kind of manipulation is to be well
informed.
Q: Do you think we will be able to program self-consciousness into a computer?
A:Yes, I do think that it’s possible to program self-consciousness into a
computer. Self-consciousness can mean many things. If you take the simplest,
crudest notion of self-consciousness, I suppose that would be the sort of self-
consciousness that a lobster has:When it’s hungry, it eats something, but it
never eats itself. It has some way of distinguishing between itself and the rest
of the world, and it has a rather special regard for itself.