Page 30 - T. Anderson-Fracture Mechanics - Fundamentals and Applns.-CRC (2005)
P. 30

1656_C01.fm  Page 10  Tuesday, April 12, 2005  5:55 PM





                       10                                    Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications


                       1.2.3 POST-WAR FRACTURE MECHANICS RESEARCH 1

                       The fracture mechanics research group at the Naval Research Laboratory was led by Dr. G.R. Irwin.
                       After studying the early work of Inglis, Griffith, and others, Irwin concluded that the basic tools
                       needed to analyze fracture were already available. Irwin’s first major contribution was to extend
                       the Griffith approach to metals by including the energy dissipated by local plastic flow [10]. Orowan
                       independently proposed a similar modification to the Griffith theory [11]. During this same period,
                       Mott [12] extended the Griffith theory to a rapidly propagating crack.
                          In 1956, Irwin [13] developed the energy release rate concept, which was derived from the
                       Griffith theory but in a form that was more useful for solving engineering problems. Shortly
                       afterward, several of Irwin’s colleagues brought to his attention a paper by Westergaard [14] that
                       was published in 1938. Westergaard had developed a semi-inverse technique for analyzing stresses
                       and displacements ahead of a sharp crack. Irwin [15] used the Westergaard approach to show that
                       the stresses and displacements near the crack-tip could be described by a single constant that was
                       related to the energy release rate. This crack-tip characterizing parameter later became known as
                       the ‘‘stress-intensity factor.” During this same period of time, Williams [16] applied a somewhat
                       different technique to derive crack tip solutions that were essentially identical to Irwin’s results.
                          A number of successful early applications of fracture mechanics bolstered the standing of this
                       new field in the engineering community. In 1956, Wells [17] used fracture mechanics to show that
                       the fuselage failures in several Comet jet aircraft resulted from fatigue cracks reaching a critical
                       size.  These cracks initiated at windows and were caused by insufficient reinforcement locally,
                       combined with square corners that produced a severe stress concentration. (Recall the unfortunate
                       hatch design in the Liberty ships.) A second early application of fracture mechanics occurred at
                       General Electric in 1957. Winne and Wundt [18] applied Irwin’s energy release rate approach to
                       the failure of large rotors from steam turbines. They were able to predict the bursting behavior of
                       large disks extracted from rotor forgings, and applied this knowledge to the prevention of fracture
                       in actual rotors.
                          It seems that all great ideas encounter stiff opposition initially, and fracture mechanics is no
                       exception. Although the U.S. military and the electric power generating industry were very sup-
                       portive of the early work in this field, such was not the case in all provinces of government and
                       industry. Several government agencies openly discouraged research in this area.
                          In 1960, Paris and his coworkers [19] failed to find a receptive audience for their ideas on
                       applying fracture mechanics principles to fatigue crack growth. Although Paris et al. provided
                       convincing experimental and theoretical arguments for their approach, it seems that design engineers
                       were not yet ready to abandon their S-N curves in favor of a more rigorous approach to fatigue
                       design. The resistance to this work was so intense that Paris and his colleagues were unable to find
                       a peer-reviewed technical journal that was willing to publish their manuscript. They finally opted
                       to publish their work in a University of Washington periodical entitled The Trend in Engineering.

                       1.2.4 FRACTURE MECHANICS FROM 1960 TO 1980

                       The Second World War obviously separates two distinct eras in the history of fracture mechanics.
                       There is, however, some ambiguity as to how the period between the end of the war and the present
                       should be divided. One possible historical boundary occursed around 1960, when the fundamentals
                       of linear elastic fracture mechanics were fairly well established, and researchers turned their
                       attention to crack-tip plasticity.



                       1  For an excellent summary of early fracture mechanics research, refer to Fracture Mechanics Retrospective: Early Classic
                       Papers (1913–1965), John M. Barsom, ed., American Society of Testing and Materials (RPS 1), Philadelphia, PA, 1987.
                       This volume contains reprints of 17 classic papers, as well as a complete bibliography of fracture mechanics papers published
                       up to 1965.
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35