Page 106 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 106

86   SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY OF UNCONVENTIONAL RESOURCE SHALES

                             Well B
                     0            1000          2000           3000

                          100ft



                                           UW
                                         MaW
                                                           H     Well A
                                                                 0     1000   2000   3000   4000   5000
                               MbW                                     100 ft
                                  LW
                      McW is a ductile driling hazard. Well went into
                      MbW and couldn’t get back up into MbW (target).            UW         MbW
                      TD was called at 3400 ft.                                                   LVV
                      (1100 ft short of plan). IP 13 BPD and 1.0MMCFd.  MaW              H
                      Uneconomic.


                        The good and the bad for the woodford:    4500 ft lateral drilled in 3 days in MbW target
                        effect of lithology and stratigraphy      (brittle). Entire operation TD’d in 34 days.
                                                                  IP 360BPD and 1.7MMCFd. Economic well.
            FIGurE 4.19  Stratigraphically targeted drilling within Woodford Brittle–Ductile couplets. In the upper figure, the well was drilled into the
            brittle (MbW) horizon, but dipped into the ductile (McW) drilling hazard zone, leading to early well shut­in. In the lower figure, the well
            was drilled into the ductile layer but was able to pull back into the brittle (MbW) layer and remain there, leading to a productive well. With
            the permission of Killian (2012).

            rEFErENCES                                           Bhattacharya JP, MacEachern JA. Hyperpycnal rivers and  prodeltaic
                                                                   shelves in the Cretaceous seaway of North America. J Sediment
            Abouelresh MO, Slatt RM. Lithofacies and sequence stratigraphy   Res 2009;79:184–209.
              of the Barnett Shale in the east‐central Fort Worth Basin, Texas,   Bohacs K, Lazar R. Sequence stratigraphy in fine‐grained rocks at
              USA. AAPG Bull 2012a:1–22.                           the field to flow‐unit scale: insights for correlation, mapping
            Abouelresh MO, Slatt RM. Lithofacies and sequence stratigraphy   and genetic controls. In: Applied Geoscience Conference, 2010,
              of the Barnett Shale in east‐central Fort Worth Basin, Texas.   Applied Geoscience Conference of US Gulf Region, Mudstones
              AAPG Bull 2012b;96:1–22.                             as Unconventional Shale Gas/Oil Reservoirs, Houston
            Adams C. Shale gas activity in British Columbia, exploration and   Geological Society Shale Gas  Technical Program, Houston,
              development of BC’s Shale Gas areas, Ministry of Energy, Mines   Texas; February 8–9, 2010.
              and Petroleum Resources, Resource Development and Geoscience   Brito, R.J., 2014, Geological characterization and sequence strati­
              Branch. 3rd Annual Unconventional Gas Tech. Forum; 2009.  graphic framework of the Brown Shale, central Sumatra Basin,
            Amorocho‐Sanchez JD. Sequence stratigraphy and seisic interpre­  Indonesia:  Implications  as  an  unconventional  resource
              tation of the upper Devonian‐lower Mississippian  Woodford   [Unpublished MS  thesis]. University of Oklahoma, Norman,
              Shale in the Cherokee Platform: a characterization approach for   Oklahoma. 91p.
              unconventional resources [Unpublished M.Sc. thesis].   Donovan AD, Staerker TS. Sequence stratigraphy of the Eagle
              University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma; 2012. 109 p.  Ford (Boquillas) formation in the subsurface of South Texas
            Baruch ET, Slatt RM, Marfurt KJ. Seismic stratigraphic analysis of   and outcrops of West Texas. Gulf Coast Assoc Geol Soc Trans
              the Barnett Shale and Ellenburger unconformity southwest of   2010;60:861–899.
              the core area of the Newark East field, Fort Worth Basin, Texas.   Fang H, Jianyu C, Yongchuan S, Yaozong L. Application of organic
              In: Breyer JA, editor. Shale Reservoirs—Giant Resources for   facies studies to sedimentary basin analysis: a case study from
              the 21st Century. 2012. AAPG Memoir 97; p 403–418.   the Yitong Graben, China. Org Geochem 1993;20:27–42.
            Bennett RH, O’Brien NR, Hulbert MH. Determinants of clay and   Goldhammer RK. Second‐order accommodation cycles and points
              shale microfabric  signatures: processes  and mechanisms. In:   of “stratigraphic turnaround”: implications for carbonate
              Bennett RH, Bryant WR, Hulbert MH, editors. Microstructure   buildup reservoirs in Mesozoic carbonate systems of the East
              of Fine‐Grained Sediments: From Mud to Shale.  New York:   Texas Salt Basin and south Texas. In: Demis WD, Nelis MK,
              Springer‐Verlag; 1991. p 5–32.                       editors. West Texas Geological Society Annual Field Conference
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111