Page 107 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs

REFERENCES 87
Guidebook. Volume 98–105, West Texas Geologic Society O’Brien NR, Slatt RM. Argillaceous rock atlas. New York:
Publication, Midland, Texas; 1998. p 11–28. Springer‐Verlag; 1990. p 141.
Hammes U, Hamlin HS, Ewing TE. Geologic analysis of the upper Paxton ST, Cardott BJ. Oklahoma gas shales field trip, October 21
Jurassic Haynesville shale in east Texas and west Louisiana. & 23, 2008: Oklahoma Geological Survey Open File Report
AAPG 2011;95:1643–1666. 2‐2008; 2008. 110 p.
Haq BU, Hardenbol J, Vail PR. Mesozoic and Cenozoic chro­ Paxton ST, Cruse A, Krystyniak A. Fingerprints of global sea level
nostratigraphy and cycles of sea‐level change. In: Wilgus CK, change revealed in hydrocarbon source rock? 2007, http http://
Hastings BS, St. Kendall CGC, Posamentier HW, Ross CA, www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2006/06095paxton/
Van Wagoner JC, editors. Sea‐Level changes—an integrated images/paxton.pdf (accessed February 5, 2013).
approach. 1984. SEPM Spec. Pub l. No. 42; p 71–108. Pollastro RM. Geologic framework of the Mississippian Barnett
Johnson JG, Klapper G, Sandberg CA. Devonian eustatic fluctua­ Shale, Barnett–Paleozoic total petroleum system, Bend Arch‐
tions in Euramerica. Geol Soc Am Bull 1985;96:567–587. Fort Worth Basin, Texas. AAPG Bull 2007;91:405–436.
Johnson KS, Amsden TW, Denison RE, Dutton SP, Goldstein AG, Portas R. Characterization and origin of fracture patterns in the
Jr. Rascoe B, Sutherland PK, Thompson DM. Geology of the Woodford Shale in southeastern Oklahoma for application to
southern Midcontinent. Oklahoma Geological Survey Special exploration and development [Master’s thesis]. Norman,
Publication 89‐2; 1989. p 1–53. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma; 2009. 113 p.
Katz BJ, Dawson WC. Pematang‐Sihapas! Petroleum system of Rimmer SM, Thompson JA, Goodnight SA, Robl TL. Multiple con­
central Sumatra. Proceeding of the Conference on Petroleum trols on the preservation of organic matter in Devonian‐
Systems of SE Asia and Australasia; Jakarta, Indonesia; 1997. Mississippian marine black shales geochemical and petrographic
p 685–698. evidence. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
Killian BJ. Sequence stratigraphy of the Woodford Shale, Anadarko 2004;215:125–154.
Basin, Oklahoma: implications on regional Woodford target Rine JM, Ginsburg RN. Depositional facies of a mud shoreface
correlation [M.S. thesis]. University of Oklahoma; 2012. 102 p. in Suriname, South America. J Sediment Petrol 1985;55:
Lash GG, and Blood R. Chemostratigraphic trends of the Middle 633–652.
Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin: Preliminary
Observation: AAPG Search and Discovery Article Schieber J, Southard JB. Bedload transport of mud by floccule
#80198; 2011. ripples—direct observation of ripple migration processes and
their implications. Geology 2009;37:483–486.
Lash GG, Engelder T. Thickness trends and sequence stratigraphy
of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Formation, Appalachian Schieber J, Southard J, Thaisen K. Accretion of mudstone
basin: implications for Acadian foreland basin evolution. AAPG beds from migrating floccule ripples. Science 2007;318:
Bull 2011;95:61–103. 1760–1763.
Lewis E, Behling M, Pool S, An overview of Marcellus and other Serna‐Bernal A. Geological characterization of the Woodford
Devonian Shale Production in West Virginia. AAPG Search and Shale, McAlister Cemetary Quarry, Criner Hills, Oklahoma
Discovery Article #10372; 2011. [Unpublished M.S. thesis]. University of Oklahoma, Norman,
Loucks RG, Ruppel SC. Mississippian Barnett Shale: lithofacies Oklahoma; 2013. 141 p.
and depositional setting of a deep‐water shale‐gas succession in Singh P. Lithofacies and sequence stratigraphic framework of the
the Fort Worth Basin, Texas. AAPG Bull 2007;91:579–601. Barnett Shale, northeast Texas [Ph.D. dissertation]. The
May JA, Anderson DS. Mudrock reservoir deposition and stratig­ University of Oklahoma; 2008. 181 p.
raphy: not homogenous, not boring. AAPG Search and Discovery Slatt RM. Important geological properties of unconventional
#90122; 2011. resource shales. Cent Eur J Geosci 2011;3:435–448.
Miall AD. The Geology of Stratigraphic Sequences. Berlin: Slatt RM, Abousleiman Y, Merging sequence stratigraphy and
Springer‐Verlag; 1997. p 433. geomechanics for unconventional gas shales. Leading Edge
Molinares‐Blanco C. Stratigraphy and palynomorphs composition 2011;30(3):1–8. Special section: Shales.
of the Woodford Shale in the Wyche Farm Shale pit, Pontotoc Slatt RM, O’Brien NR. Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford
County, Oklahoma [M.S. thesis]. Norman, Oklahoma: gas shales: contribution to understanding gas storage and
University of Oklahoma; 2013. 90 p. migration pathways in fine‐grained rocks. AAPG Bull
Moslow TF, Davies GR. Turbidite reservoir facies in the lower 2011;95:2017–2030.
Triassic Montney Formation, east‐central Alberta. Bull Can Slatt RM, Rodriguez ND. Comparative sequence stratigraphy and
Petrol Geol 1997;45:507–536. organic geochemistry of gas shales: commonality or coinci­
Mulder T, Chapron E. Flood deposits in continental and marine dence? J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2012;8:68–64.
environments: character and significance. In: Slatt R, Zavala C, Slatt RM, Philp P, O’Brien N, Abousleiman Y, Singh P, Eslinger
editors. Sediment transfer from shelf to deep water revisiting the EV, Perez R, Portas RM, Baruch ET, Marfurt KJ, Madrid‐
delivery mechanisms. Volume 61, Tulsa: AAPG Stud Geol; Arroyo S. Pore‐ to regional‐ scale, integrated characterization
2011. p 1–31. workflow for unconventional gas shales. In: Breyer JA, editor.
Nakajima T. Hyperpycnites deposited 700 km away from river mouths Shale Reservoirs—Giant Resources for the 21st Century. 2012.
in the Central Japan Sea. J Sediment Res 2006;76:60–73. AAPG Memoir 97; p 127–150.