Page 118 - Fundamentals of Light Microscopy and Electronic Imaging
P. 118

PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY         101

                       deviated or diffracted wave (D wave) that becomes scattered in many directions. Typi-
                       cally, only a minority of incident waves are diffracted by cellular objects. Both S and D
                       waves are collected by the objective lens and focused in the image plane at the site cor-
                       responding to the image of the particle, where they undergo interference and generate a
                       resultant particle wave (P wave). The relationship among waves is thus described as
                       P   S   D. Detection of the object image depends on the intensities, and hence on the
                       amplitudes, of the P and S waves. Only when the amplitudes of the P and S waves are
                       significantly different in the image plane can we see the object in the microscope. Before
                       beginning our explanation of the interference mechanism, we should note our earlier
                       discussion of the coherence of light waves in the myriad small beams (wave bundles)
                       illuminating the specimen (Chapter 5). This condition is of great practical importance
                       for phase contrast microscopy, because image formation through constructive and
                       destructive interference requires coherent illumination such that: (1) A definite phase
                       relationship exists between the S and D waves, and (2) the phase relationship must be
                       preserved between the object and the image.

                       DEPICTION OF WAVE INTERACTIONS WITH SINE WAVE
                       AND VECTOR DIAGRAMS
                       With this general scheme in mind, let us now examine Figure 7-5a, which shows the S,
                       D, and P waves as sine waves of a given wavelength in the region of the object in the
                       image plane. The S and P waves, whose relative intensities determine the visual con-
                       trast, are shown as solid lines, whereas the D wave (never directly observed) is shown as
                       a dashed line. The amplitude of each wave represents the sum of the E vectors of the
                       component waves. The D wave is lower in amplitude than the S wave, because there are
                       fewer D-wave photons than there are S-wave photons at the image point. Notice that the
                       D wave is retarded in phase by  /4 relative to the S wave due to its interaction with the
                       object particle. The P wave resulting from interference between the D and S waves is
                       retarded relative to the S wave by only a small amount (  /20) and has an amplitude
                       similar to that of the S wave. Since the S and P waves have close to the same amplitude




                         For a physicist interested in optics it was not a great step to change over from this
                       subject to the microscope. Remember that in Ernst Abbe’s remarkable theory of the
                       microscope image the transparent object under the microscope is compared with a grating.
                       Abbe examined gratings made of alternating opaque and transparent strips (amplitude
                       gratings). Gratings made of transparent alternating thick and thin strips (phase gratings)
                       produce diffraction spots that show a phase difference of 90°. For a phase object, my phase
                       strip in the focal plane of the microscope objective brought the direct image of the light
                       source into phase with the diffracted images, making the whole comparable to the images
                       caused by an amplitude object. Therefore the image in the eyepiece appears as that of an
                       absorbing object—that is, with black and white contrast, just as if the object has been
                       stained.
                         On looking back on these events I am impressed by the great limitations of the human
                       mind. How quick we are to learn—that is, to imitate what others have done or thought
                       before—and how slow to understand—that is, to see the deeper connections. Slowest of all,
                       however, are we in inventing new connections or even in applying old ideas in a new field. In
                       my case, the really new point was the diffraction pattern of lines of the grating artifacts, the
                       fact that they differed in phase from the principal line, and that visualization of phases
                       required projection of the diffraction image on a coherent background. The full name of the
                       new method of microscopy might be something like “phase-strip method for observing phase
                       objects in good contrast.” I shortened this to “phase contrast.”
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123