Page 241 - Fundamentals of Ocean Renewable Energy Generating Electricity From The Sea
P. 241

230 Fundamentals of Ocean Renewable Energy


            forced with the two principal semidiurnal tidal constituents, M 2 and S 2 , these
            represent peak spring tidal currents. The peak velocity vectors also provide a
            qualitative overview of the tidal asymmetry [32], and the tidal flow appears to
            be largely ebb-dominant (peak currents directed northwest) in Westray Firth,
                                                                     7
            and flood-dominant (peak currents directed southeast) in Stronsay Firth. Where
            these two Firths join (i.e. in the vicinity of the Fall of Warness), the circulation is
            further complicated by the presence of strong residual eddies with length scales
            of around 4–5 km [33]. However, the tidal currents in this region appear to be
            more symmetrical, and divergence of the peak velocity vectors indicates that
            this is a bed-load parting zone [32]. The bathymetric/topographic restriction of
            the Fall of Warness impedes the flow along the channel, which is driven by the
            tidal pressure gradient. This impedance results in an acceleration of the flow
            downstream of the restriction. This leads to a divergence of the residual flow
            centred on the Fall of Warness, which is further complicated by variability in
            bathymetry and geometry along and across the channel (Fig. 8.25).
               The advantage of a 3D tidal model, compared with a depth-averaged 2D
            model, is that the vertical distribution of variables in the water column is
            calculated directly, rather than parameterized. Here, we show detailed results
            for velocity and turbulence properties for all depths in the water column at three
            locations which exhibit varying degrees of asymmetry: site 2 (ebb-dominant),
            site 9 (symmetrical), and site 21 (flood-dominant) (Fig. 8.23).
               Velocity time series for the three selected locations are plotted in Fig. 8.26.
            Above the boundary layer, the asymmetry for sites 2 and 21 is evident at
            all depths in the water column, and is more pronounced during spring tides.
            Therefore, for all practical scenarios of energy extraction, that is device hub
            placed at some height in the water column that is above the near-bed boundary
            layer, strong velocity asymmetry will translate into an even stronger asymmetry
            in power output (because power is related to velocity cubed). Such asymmetry in
            the flow field is clearly undesirable from an electricity generation perspective,
            and so symmetrical sites (such as site 9) are more attractive for commercial
            development.
               Turbulent kinetic energy (k) per unit mass is defined as
                                      1  
2   
2   
2
                                  k =  (u + v + w )                    (8.46)
                                      2
            k is plotted at three contrasting locations (Fig. 8.27). The corresponding plot for
            the rate of dissipation (
)of k is shown in Fig. 8.28, defined as
                                       dk
                                          ∼                            (8.47)
                                          = P −
                                       dt



            7. Because the tidal wave propagates eastwards across the north of Scotland (Fig. 8.24), the tidal
              currents are directed approximately southeastward along these Firths during the flood phase of
              the tide.
   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246