Page 386 - Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing
P. 386

still large.

                     This  problem  can  be  avoided  by  ensuring  that  the  sample  set  is  dense
               enough to guarantee that the three samples are all on the mainlobe. One way to
               do this is to oversample in Doppler, i.e., choose K > M. Another is to window
               the data. For most common windows, the expansion of the mainlobe that results
               is sufficient to guarantee that the apparent peak samples and its two neighbors
               fall on the same lobe, so that the basic assumption of a quadratic segment is

               more valid. Figure 5.21b illustrates this effect by applying a Hamming window
               to the same data used for Fig. 5.21a and again applying a 20-point DFT. Note
               that the peak DTFT amplitude is now 10.34 due to the effect of the Hamming
               window. Applying quadratic interpolation to this spectrum gives an estimated
               spectral peak frequency and amplitude of 1336.6 Hz and 9.676, respectively,
               errors of 6.4 percent in amplitude and 13.4 Hz in frequency. A hybrid technique
               can be defined that combines attributes of the quadratic interpolation and the

               more  exact  asinc  interpolation.  The  parabolic  method  is  used  to  identify  the
               frequency  of  the  peak,  and  then Eq. (5.95) is used to estimate the amplitude.
               This  approach  improves  amplitude  accuracy  while  avoiding  the  need  to
               compute Eq. (5.95) more than once.
                     Figure  5.22  illustrates  the  frequency  estimation  performance  of  the
               quadratic  interpolator  both  with  and  without  Hamming  windowing  on  a

               sinusoidal data sequence of length M = 30. Part a of the figure illustrates the
               minimally sampled case K  = M. The interpolated frequency estimates are best
               when the actual frequency is either very close to a sample frequency or exactly
               half way between two sample frequencies. If no window is used, the worst case
               error of 0.23 bins occurs when the actual frequency is 0.35 bins away from a
               sample frequency. A Hamming window reduces this maximum error to 0.067
               bins  at  an  offset  of  0.31  bins. Figure 5.22b shows the performance when the

               spectrum  sampling  density  is  slightly  more  than  doubled  to K  =  64.  The
               maximum frequency estimation error is only 0.022 bins without the window and
               0.014 bins with the Hamming window.
   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391