Page 832 - Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes : Physical, Chemical, and Biological
P. 832

Appendix C: Miscellaneous Relations                                                              787



                                                               than if we guessed at random. The idea is expressed by
                2.0
                                                               saying that there is some ‘‘correlation’’ between x and y
                                                               (Griffin, 1936).
                1.5                                            C.5 SIEVE ANALYSIS


               y =log x  1.0         Arithmetic mean of x =5 and x =95  C.5.1 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES
                          Geometric mean of  x =5 and x =95    of two kinds, generally: (1) U.S. Standard sieve, and (2) Tyler
                                                               Sieves for the size distribution analysis of granular media are

                0.5                                            series. Often, plotting paper is not available. Figure C.4 is a
                                                               plot layout for plotting size distribution data based on U.S.

                                                               line. In the analysis of granular media for filters, the d 60 an d 10
                0.0                                            Standard sieves. The data plot is most commonly as a straight
                                                               sizes are of greatest interest.
                    0  10  20  30  40  50  60  70  80  90  100
                                      x
            FIGURE C.3 Illustration of how geometric mean biases result  C.6 COST INDEXES
            toward lower result than given by data. (From Parkhurst, D.F.,
                                                               In places where cost data are used, the date of construction is
            Environmental Science and Technology, 32(3), 92A, 1998.)
                                                               given also (as a rule). This permits cost updating by the use of
                                                               cost indexes. Using the ENR Construction Cost Index (CCI),
                                                               for example
            C.4 STATISTICS
                                                                 Cost(present year) ¼ Cost(year of construction)
            C.4.1 GEOMETRIC MEAN
                                                                                       CCI(present year)   (C:41)
            Frequently, data are reported in terms of their ‘‘geometric               CCI(year of construction)
            means.’’ Often this parameter is referred to in regulations.
            Geometric mean is defined as the antilog of the mean of the
                                                               in which
            logarithms of a set of numbers (Parkhurst, 1998).
                                                                  Cost(present year) ¼ constructed cost of a given facility in
              Parkhurst (1998) makes the case that the geometric mean
                                                                    current year
            has no rationale for its use and the arithmetic mean is a more
                                                                  Cost(year of construction) ¼ constructed cost of a given
            accurate estimate of the population mean of any sample. The
                                                                    facility in year construction was completed (dollars)
            basic problem with the geometric mean is that it biases the
                                                                  CCI(present year) ¼ ENR Construction Cost Index for pre-
            mean toward the lower data values in a set as the larger values
                                                                    sent year (no units)
            contribute less toward the geometric mean. This is illustrated
                                                                  CCI(year of construction) ¼ ENR Construction Cost Index
            in Figure C.3 that shows 0 < x < 100 with the corresponding y
                                                                    for year construction was completed for the given facil-
            values equal to log x.
                                                                    ity (no units)
                                                               To provide a means for such updating is the purpose of
            C.4.2 LOG NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
                                                               reviewing the topic of cost indexes here. The application of
            A log normal distribution is defined (Parkhurst, 1998) as  a simple ratio may be the basis for getting an idea of the
            occurring when the logarithms of a set of numbers have a  current cost of a given facility, it is also simplistic and its use
            normal distribution.                               should be limited to obtaining an initial estimate. Engineering
                                                               cost estimating requires more depth of knowledge than given
                                                               here, and experience in the use and interpretation of various
            C.4.3 CORRELATION
                                                               kinds of cost indexes.
            Suppose we have two tabulated values of x and y.
            And suppose that numerous values of y have been found
                                                               C.6.1 CAVEATS ON COST INDEXES
            associated with any one value of x. We cannot simply write
            y ¼ f(x). But the mean,   y, of the y values associated with any x,  As a caveat (complementing statements in the previous para-
            may vary with x in a fairly definite manner. Then, although  graph), one should be aware that in water treatment, factors
            individual predictions as to the y value to be expected with  comprising costs may change in ways that are different than
            a given x will be subject to considerable uncertainty, we can  some of the indexes. Membranes, e.g., were a new technol-
            determine whether, on the average, large or small values  ogy in 1970; the technology has evolved since that date,
            of y tend to go with large values of x. We can, in fact,  demand has increased, and prices have come down. The
            make individual predictions with smaller average errors  building that houses a primarily membrane plant may be
   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837