Page 66 - Gas Purification 5E
P. 66

58   Gas Purijcation

                    selectivity for H2S over COz can be  adjusted, as required, by blending a primary or sec-
                    ondary amine with a tertiary amine, such as MDEA, in just the right proportions.

                    Sterically Hindered Amines

                      Although sterically hindered amines are not necessarily alkanolamines, their characteris-
                    tics as gas purification agents are sufficiently similar to those of  the alkanolamines to be
                    included in this chapter. A family of solvents based on hindered amines is licensed by Exxon
                    Research  and Engineering Co. under the broad designation of Flexsorb  Solvents. The
                    processes have been described in some detail by Goldstein (1983): Weinberg et al. (1983),
                    and Chludzinski and Wiechart (1986). The hindered amines are used as promoters in hot
                    potassium carbonate systems (Flexsorb HP); as components of  organic solventfamine sys-
                    tem with characteristics similar to Shell's  Sulfinol process (Flexsorb PS); and as the princi-
                    pal agent in aqueous solutions for the selective absorption of  HIS in the pre.sence of  C02
                    (Flexsorb SE and SE+). Each system makes use of a different sterically hindered amine with
                    a specifically designed molecular configuration. On the basis of pilot and commercial plant
                    experience, substantial savings in capital and operating cost are claimed for this technology.
                    As of  1994, it was reported that 32 Flexsorb plants were operating or in design (Exxon
                    Research and Engineering Co.,  1994).


                    Amine Concentration

                      The choice of amine concentration may be quite arbitrary and is usually made on the basis
                    of operating experience. Typical concentrations of monoethanolamine range from 12 wt% to
                    a maximum of  32 wt%.  On the basis of  operating experience in five plants, Feagan et al.
                    (1954) recommended the use of  a design concentration of  15  wt8 monoethanolamine in
                    water. The same solution strength was recommended by Connors (1958). Dupart et al.
                    (1993A, 1993B) recommend a maximum MEA concentration of 20 wt%. However, it should
                    be noted that higher amine concentrations, up to 32 wt8 MEA, may be used when corrosion
                    inhibitors are added to the solution and when C02 is the only acid gas component.
                      Diethanolamine solutions that are used for treatment of  refinery gases typically range in
                    concentration from 20 to 25 wt%? while concentrations of 25 to 30 wt% are commonly used
                    for natural gas purification. Diglycolamine solutions typically contain 40 to 60 wt% amine in
                    water, and MDEA solution concentrations may range from 35 to 55 wt%.
                      It should be noted that increasing the amine concentration will generally reduce the
                    required solution circulation rate. and therefore the plant cost. However, the effect is not as
                    great as might be expected, the principal reason being that the acid-gas vapor pressure is
                    higher over more concentrated solutions at equivalent acid-gaslamine mole ratios.  In addi-
                    tion, when an attempt is made to absorb the same quantity of acid gas in a smaller volume of
                    solution, the heat of reaction results in a greater increase in tempexature and a consequently
                    increased acid-gas vapor pressure over the solution. The effect of increasing the amine con-
                    centration in a specific operating plant using DGA solution for the removal of  about  158
                    acid gas from associated gas is shown in Figure 2-9. The authors of  this study concluded
                    that the optimum DGA strength for this case is about 50 wt%. The effect of the increasing
                    amount of  DGA at higher concentrations is almost nullified by the decreasing net acid gas
                    absorption per mole of DGA (Huval and van de Venne, 1981).
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71