Page 236 - gas transport in porous media
P. 236

Stockman
                           232
                                  Bounce-Back Interpretation
                           13.4.1
                           During the development of lattice gas automata, it was noted (Cornubert, 1991) that
                           the traditional bounce-back condition did not put the zero-velocity boundary on the
                           solid nodes, but rather, at a position roughly halfway between a solid node and the
                           adjacent fluid node. The accuracy of the reinterpreted bounce-back is a function of
                           τ (thus the viscosity; Chen et al., 1996), but the nature of the variation is not made
                           clear in most publications.
                             Figure 13.8 shows the position of the solid-fluid boundary in a small 2-D model, 8
                           columns wide by 8 rows high. The “nodes” of the model are shown as black circles. A
                           solid at node (x, y) is considered a square “block” extending from x−0.5 to x+0.5, and
                           from y−0.5 to y+0.5; solids are represented in the figure as gray blocks. This interpre-
                           tation assigns a constant volume to each solid block, hence it is very easy to account
                           for volume changes when (e.g.) solids dissolve or precipitate. In addition, when a
                           geometry is supplied as a “voxel map” (volumetric pixels) from an X-ray tomographic
                           scan, this interpretation allows a 1:1 map from voxel volume to LB volume.
                             There are several problems with the bounce-back method, as regards estimation
                           of permeability and dispersion. Some of the LB fluid is resident on the solid nodes.
                           Presumably, thefluidresidentonthenodesmustbeconsideredinanaccountofapplied
                           body force, and it is not straightforward to apply forcing at the solid site. However,
                           tests performed by the author suggest that forcing on the solid can be ignored, and
                           forcing may be applied only at the fluid sites. Some tracers are resident on the nodes,
                           behind the 1/2 boundary implied by the reinterpreted bounce-back; thus the effective
                           width of a channel for dispersion may be slightly greater than the width for flow. The
                           effective lateral diffusion coefficient of tracer at the solid nodes is debatable; with



                                                               x
                                                 0   1   2  3   4   5   6  7
                                              0
                                              1

                                              2
                                              3
                                           y
                                              4

                                              5
                                              6
                                              7

                           Figure 13.8. The black dots represent the node positions in the LB automaton; the gray blocks show the
                           solid volume associated with each node in the “reinterpreted bounce-back” approach
   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241