Page 212 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 212

214                                                             Chapter 7

             beyond 2 km of FI to be considerably less prospective than locations within 2 km of FI.
             The fuzzy membership function in equation  (7.6) or Fig. 7-11B is, thus, apparently
             consistent with the conceptual knowledge-based  representation  of spatial evidence
             illustrated in Fig. 7-8.
                Another example of a universe of discourse Y in mineral prospectivity mapping is a
             variety of geochemical anomalies. A set of fuzzy evidence from this Y is multi-element
             stream sediment anomalies defined by, say, catchment basin analysis (hereafter denoted
             as ANOMALY). Based on the results  of analysis of spatial association between
             ANOMALY and epithermal Au deposit occurrences in the case study area (see Figs. 6-
             12E and 6-12F), the following membership function may be defined for the fuzzy set
             ‘favourable ANOMALY’ (g):

                                                0
                   ­         0             for  y < 14
                                                 .
                                                      .
             μ (  = ) y  °  )  . 0 (  34 − 14.0  )  for  . 0  14 ≤y ≤ 34         (7.7)
                   ® − 14.0(y
                                                     0
              g
                   °
                                                 .
                                                0
                   ¯         1             for  y > 34

             where y represents values of ANOMALY scores. The graph and generic form of this
             function are illustrated in Fig. 7-12A. The parameters of the function (i.e., 0.14 and 0.34,
             which are α and γ, respectively, in Fig. 7-12A) represent (a) the maximum of the range
             of ANOMALY scores (e.g.,  0.14; see  Figs.  6-12E and 6-12F)  considered to be
             completely non-significant and (b) the minimum of the range to ANOMALY scores with
             optimum positive spatial association with the epithermal Au deposit occurrences (i.e.,
             0.34; see Figs. 6-12E and 6-12F). The fuzzy membership function in equation (7.7) or
             Fig.  7-12A is linear and, thus, inconsistent with the  conceptual  knowledge-based
             representation  of  spatial evidence illustrated in Fig.  7-8. Alternatively, the following
             membership function may be defined for the set ‘favourable ANOMALY’ (g):

                   ­            0             for  y < 14
                                                    .
                                                   0
                   °  [ − 14.0(x  )  . 0 (  34 − 14  ] )  2  for  . 0  14 ≤y ≤ β
                                    0
                                     .
                   ®
             μ (  = ) y  °                2              .                       (7.8)
              g
                                     0
                                                      .
                                                     0
                                      .
                   °  1  [ − 0(  . 34 − ) x  . 0 (  34 − 14  ] )  for β ≤y ≤ 34
                                    0
                                                    .
                                                   0
                           − )(max
                                     .
                   ¯ [ ° .0  1 (max y  − 34 ) ]+ 9.0  for  y > 34

             The graph and generic form of this function are illustrated in Fig. 7-12B. The function in
             equation (7.8) consists of a linear part (i.e., the last condition) and a continuous nonlinear
             part  (i.e., the  first three conditions). The former is called a  right-shoulder  S function
                        +
             (denoted as  S  in  Fig.  7-12B). The parameters of the  fuzzy membership function  in
                                                                                    +
             equation (7.8) are the same as those of the function in equation (7.7). However, the S
             function in equation (7.8) requires another parameter, β, which is a value of y that forces
             the function to equal the cross-over point (i.e., fuzzy membership equal to 0.5; Fig. 7-
             12B). Choosing a suitable value of  y to represent  β requires expert judgment. The
             median of the range of values between α and γ could, for example, be chosen for β. So,
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217