Page 301 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 301

304                                                             Chapter 8



























             Fig. 8-23. (A) Epithermal Au prospectivity map of Aroroy district (Philippines) portrayed as
             discriminant scores of spatial evidence layers with respect to training set AA of 79 coherent proxy
             deposit-type locations (Fig. 8-8) and 9640 non-deposit locations. Polygon outlined in grey is area
             of stream sediment sample catchment basins (see Fig. 4-11). The testing set of locations of 13
             epithermal Au deposits is shown as reference to the prediction-rate. (B) Fitting and prediction-rate
             curves of, respectively, proportions of coherent training proxy  deposits (grey  dots) and testing
             deposits (black dots) demarcated by the predictions versus proportion of the study area predicted
             as prospective based on the discriminant scores. The grey  and  black dots represent classes of
             discriminant scores that  correspond spatially with certain numbers of training  coherent proxy
             deposit-type locations (in grey) and certain numbers of testing deposit-type locations (in black),
             respectively.


             in LDA (a) results in empirical spatial associations between epithermal Au deposits and
             indicative geological features that are consistent with the results of the application of the
             distance correlation  method (see Chapter 6, Table 6-IX) and with  the data-driven
             estimates of  Bel shown in Fig.  8-15 and (b)  does not undermine the geological
             significance of the predictor variables with respect to the target variable. It also follows
             that the scheme of spatial evidence representation for raster-based GIS  application  of
             LDA to mineral prospectivity mapping (Fig. 8-20) allows proper comparison with the
             results of the application of data-driven evidential belief modeling.
                The maps of discriminant scores based on training set AA (Fig. 8-23A) and training
             set BB (Fig. 8-24A) portray mostly NNW-trending linear patterns of intermediate and
             high  values reflecting the spatial evidence  of  proximity to NNW-trending
             faults/fractures. However, the discriminant scores are highest mostly where the NNW-
             trending linear patterns intersect with circular patterns reflecting the spatial evidence of
   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306