Page 53 - Geochemical Remote Sensing of The Sub-Surface
P. 53

30                                                    O.F.  Putikov  and  B.  Wen

            Water,  C,  10 -6M/g   A
             10 7   .......                      t.1!
             10 6                            %/i
             10 5
                                      Br s/
             10 4
                      !                         /   i
                                           ... .
             1o 3   ..............   : ................   :  !  ...............   .~,~ . . . . . . .  v.,  . . . . . . . . .  .g  "! .......
                                      . . .
                                     .
             10 z
             1o I  ..............   i ...............   ....   .  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                      i      /   co  ': c~.  i     i
             lO o     i    /~.      ,y   v  i      ~:
             10-1  .............    9  ~  -  ~  .........   ~.  ......
                      i      .Sb ~   i     !       i
             10 .2    :       !/~eAsw   !   i      i
             10 -3  ............ ~.,.~.~..~._~i17;i  ..... i ............. ] .............. .i ......
             i0 4
               ..............................................   . .............................   , .......
             i0/0-5   10-4   10-3   '10-2   10-1   10 0   101   10 2  10 3   10 4   10 5   [I  6
                             oil,  C,  10 9  MOI/g
           Water  C,  106g/!      B
             10 7                                  : ~1
             lO 6                    i    .a       :
             lO s  ..............  : ...............  ~ ...........   i .  .  .  .
             1o 4
             ,0-'  .............. i ............... i .......   ~~  .........   ~ ........
                                     i
                      i      i    ~   !:  ~r  i   i
                                                  !
                                           i
             102      i      ~ b ~  AI  nSr
                ..............  i ...............  i ..............   i ....  Nf .....  ! ..............  ",' .......
             ,o,      ,    Z   .....  ; : ~ ~ '  .....  i ..............  i .....
             iO cl
             !0 -I    :       .....   _     ...................
             10-2
             ,o-.,  ..............  ~ .... T.....~.'  ..........  i .............  i ..............  i ......
             10 -4          Bi        9     9
                .............................................   : ..............   7 ..............   '  .......
             1~r~0-5   10-4   io-.X   10-2   10-~   10 0   101   10 z  10 3   10 4   10 -~   10 6
                             oil,  (2,  10 .9  Mol/g
           Fig. 2- I 0. Correlation of the element composition of oil and oil water  in oil deposits  in Russia at:
           (A)  Severo-Krasnoborskoe,  borehole  1"  (B)  Deyminskoe, borehole 45.


              Since  the  gaseous  bubbles  that  have  the  maximum  speed  of  migration  in  a  porous
           system  have  a radius  of about  one  tenth of the radius  of the particles  of the  system,  it  is
           rational  to  suggest  that bubbles  of this  size  are  able  to pass  through  the porous  channels
           in  rocks.  In  this  case  the  dispersion  of  metals  in  mobile  forms  depends  mainly  on  the
           mechanism  of  bubble-facilitated  transport  of  metals  within  and  on  the  surface  of
           bubbles.  Dispersion  of metals  (Sb,  Cu, Zn, Pb, Fe and others)  in a gaseous  phase  in rocks
           was  established  directly by experimental  studies of hydrogeothermal  vapour (Krat,  1983)
           and  volcanic  gases  (Putikov  and  Dukhanin,  1994),  and  indirectly  by  studies  of
           subsurface  air (Kristiansson  and Malmqvist,  1986;  Krchmar,  1988;  Dukhanin,  1990).
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58